Family planning (FP) was identified as a national priority for poverty reduction and socioeconomic development by Rwanda's government in 2012. On the other hand, rural areas continue to contribute to greater fertility rates. To aid in the successful implementation of family planning policies in poor rural communities, this study first investigated sociocultural perceptions and attitudes that stymie FP acceptance in poor rural households, and then inferred critical strategies that could be used to influence rural people's perceptions and behaviour shifts in favour of contraception use and smaller family size to take advantage of smaller families' health and educational opportunities.
A quantitative
cross-sectional design determined FP use in homes, whereas a qualitative
methodology investigated socio-cultural factors that hampered FP use. A total
of 119 families with women of reproductive age (15–45) in Karongi District,
Rwanda's western province, were selected.
Social and cultural
standards had little effect on contraception use (32.8%) or exclusively
favoured natural methods (12.6 percent). Religious norms accounted for 38.5
percent of social norms, with Christianity (91.8 percent) promoting the use of
natural techniques, preferably abstinence, rather than modern procedures (which
were perceived as murdering children) (73.3 percent). Cultural norms (17.9%)
influenced families to have a large number of children as a source of wealth,
proof of productivity, and a way to relieve parents' workloads, such as assisting
mothers in family activities like cooking and assisting fathers in farming
activities like keeping cows, goats, and pigs. Other attitudes included spousal
rejection (men dominated in making FP decisions in households) (2.5 percent),
and other non-users of modern procedures (28.2 percent) were concerned about
negative effects.
Author(S) Details
Costase Ndayishimiye
Public Health Sciences (Europubhealth+), Faculty of Medicine, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
View Book:- https://stm.bookpi.org/NHMMR-V7/article/view/6659
No comments:
Post a Comment