Advantages of Daily Fast Fresh Cadaver Dissection (How Can We Organize It?) | Chapter 08 | Issues and Developments in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 8

 Objectives: A world-renowned neurosurgeon recently acknowledged at a world congress that the death rate of the most severe tumour was 18 percent when he first started operating, but it reduced to less than 5% in the following five years. We don't want to discuss it. It's the science's dark side. What can we do to avoid these issues? Although the term "learning curve" is "politically correct," what is the cost? There is a great deal of suffering, death, and problems involved. Is it necessary to hone our skills on live patients? Is it ethical? How many complicated operations do we need to conduct each year to maintain our proficiency? Is the number of training laboratories in hospitals sufficient? It isn't offered in tens of thousands of mid-sized stores. We'd like to propose a really simple method.

Over the last 15 years, we have steadily added daily fresh cadaver dissections into our practise in three mid centres. We examine the obstacles that had to be overcome at centres that lacked an anatomy lab.

The ethical and practical issues could be worked out, but the organisation was problematic. Discussion: We should return to daily training like in sports and overhaul the postgraduate training technique in intracranial and extracranial micro, endoscipic, and endovascular surgery. Every hospital has fresh cadavers on hand. The "nil nocere" surgical principle's core tenet would be this.

Author(S) Details

Csókay András
Hungarian Defence Forces Medical Center, Hungary.

Attila Josvai
Hungarian Defence Forces Medical Center, Hungary.

Csókay Gergely
Hungarian Defence Forces Medical Center, Hungary.

Jäckel Márta
Hungarian Defence Forces Medical Center, Hungary.

View Book:- https://stm.bookpi.org/IDMMR-V8/article/view/5802