In this assorted methods record of what happened we examined the relationship makeup within an joined dementia care (IDC) network and revealed how individual and organisational interests can affect interorganisational cooperation. Our research was belief-driven and included three phases: a Social Network Analysis (SNA) established data from questionnaires (n=24-26), explorative interviews accompanying network partners (n=14) and a focus group accompanying network coordinators (n=7) to investigate the conceptual generalisability of the sole case of the IDC-network. The developed public networks graphs revealed that highly affiliated organisations are established care organisations that give case management, while tinier care organisations or welfare organisations tend expected more peripheral. Care-accompanying, strategic, and economic interests influence the level of participation of organisations in the IDC-network, while private intrinsic motivations decide a representative’s contribution to the network. Conflicting interests, exceptionally clashing dreams and financial interests, powerfully influence the network structure. The results show that conflicting interests form a obstacle to successfully realise the composite goal of an IDC-network, that is, optimising the wellbeing of family with dementia and their casual caregivers in the region. Thus, IDC-networks concede possibility act to manage, resolve and bar disputes arising from conflicting interests.
Author(s) Details:
Eline Kroeze,
Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam,
Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
and Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam
Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robbert
Huijsman,
Department
Health Services and Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy &
Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/RDMMS-V8/article/view/10203
No comments:
Post a Comment