In new medicine, conversant consent is a moral and legal imperative. After snatching sufficient news from his doctor, the patient can decide on welcome own treatment. Doctors can provide therapies outside the patient's consent in some assets, such as sickness. Some situations, however, act the edge, like the patient described in this place research who had a moderate intellectual disability and declined to get an next intervention for an aortic dissection. In this instance, cardiologists and psychiatrists processed together to determine either the patient could supply his consent before deciding to respect welcome decision. The ward ethics committee backed the choice to not operate on him. The patronizing approach to the doctor-patient relationship is still common in Tunisia and different countries accompanying similar educational context. This essay examines righteous and legal issues while emphasize the need for universal ethical standard that apply to all sufferers from all backgrounds.
Author(s) Details:
Wafa Abdelghaffar,
Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of
Tunis El Manar, Tunisia and Mental Health Department, Mongi Slim Hospital,
Marsa, Tunisia.
Nadia
Haloui,
Faculty
of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia and Mental Health
Department, Mongi Slim Hospital, Marsa, Tunisia.
Myriam Ines Bouzid,
Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia and
Mental Health Department, Mongi Slim Hospital, Marsa, Tunisia.
Rym Rafrafi,
Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia and
Mental Health Department, Mongi Slim Hospital, Marsa, Tunisia.
Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/RHDHR-V2/article/view/9614
No comments:
Post a Comment