This member aimed to equate the efficiency of flexible periotomes against non-flexible unoriginal periotomes in atraumatic dental extractions of similar dentition.The study was conducted on patients the one have teeth that are designated for bilateral origin of similar teeth on the unchanging jaw and were divided into two groups. This randomized reserved clinical trial including 26 patients needing nonsurgical tooth extractions bilaterally. A total of 52 extractions were performed, either for orthodontic or insert placement purposes. After the extractions, the investigators evaluated the level of gingival cut, duration of the procedure, and wound restorative on postoperative days 1 and 7. Conventional fang extraction plans can cause damage to the surrounding bone and change of the socket. The results presented that the flexible periotomes accepted less time (about 4 minutes) than the unoriginal periotomes (7 minutes) for the students that study together (flexible periotome) and control group (established periotome), respectively. Furthermore, gingival lacerations in the study group were noticed to be less harsh. The use of flexible periotomes was erect to be more efficient in atraumatic dental extractions distinguished to conventional periotomes.This study emphasises the need of achievement atraumatic extractions using modern technologies, particularly in the term of implantology where skilled is a greater need for specific treatments.
Author(s) Details:
Zoya Rafiq,
Department
of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yenepoya Dental College, Mangalore, India.
Kolari
Vinayakrishna,
Department
of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yenepoya Dental College, Mangalore, India.
Joyce P. Sequeira,
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yenepoya Dental
College, Mangalore, India.
Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/NAMMS-V9/article/view/11169
No comments:
Post a Comment