Comparison of Detergents, Their Additives, Crude Extracts of Biodetergents and Lipases Plus Mineral Solution in the Bioremediation of Soil Impacted by Hydrocarbons | Chapter 9 | Research Highlights in Science and Technology Vol. 6

 This affiliate highlight (a) to resolve  biostimulation of soil impacted by WMO accompanying Eficaz®, Salvo® and Savia Gel® plus not organic solution; (b) to study in soil jolted by WMO biostimulation with polyethylene glycol, sodium tripolyphosphate plus not organic solution (c) to raise in soil impacted by WMO  biostimulation accompanying Tween 80, Triton X-100, with unrefined extracts of biodetergents and lipases, plus a not organic solution to defeat the WMO to a value beneath the maximum of 4,400 ppm of NOM-138 SEMANART/SSA1-2012 (NOM-138) to regard as bioremediated. In biostimulation of agricultural soil jolted by 60,000 ppm of waste motor lubricate (WMO), it is neither completely solubilized accompanying a soap nor removed as anticipated with a not organic solution. For this reason, in the biostimulation of soil jolted by WMO, pure detergents are used: Tween-80 and Trition-X 100 or commercial detergents: Eficaz®, Salvo® and Savia Gel®, neglecting the effect of their supplements: polyethylene glycol or sodium tripolyphosphate, in the emulsification of WMO emulsification. Nor if the application of joining crude extracts of biodetergents and lipases plus a not organic solution is more productive in the bioremediation of that soil. In this sense, the production of CO2 by WMO decay and its aggregation by Soxhlet were calculated. The experimental dossier were validated by Tukey HSD ANOVA. The results demonstrated that the soil impacted accompanying 60,000 ppm of WMO biostimulated with Salvo®, Eficaz® plus not organic solution, had maximum CO2 result eventually 45 with 10.42 mg CO2/100 g and WMO abated from 60,000 ppm to 21,700 ppm. In soil impacted by WMO biostimulated accompanying sodium tripolyphosphate and mineral answer, in 40 days it reached 9.2 mg CO2/100 g of soil. In soil jolted by WMO biostimulated with Tween 80, Triton X-100, vulgar extracts of biodetergent and lipases plus not organic solution, the maximum CO2 result was reached and the capital of WMO decrease from 60,000 ppm to 1,600 ppm. In soil impacted by WMO biostimulated by raw extracts of biodetergents and lipases plus mineral resolution, not biostimulated by Tween 80 or Triton X-100, WMO decreased from 60,000 to 2,000 ppm. This result shows in biostimulation of soil violated by WMO requesting crude extracts of biodetergents and lipases are better than the use of marketing with allure additives and clean detergents plus mineral resolution in the removal of WMO for soil bioremediation in accordance with NOM-138.

Author(s) Details:

Blanca Celeste Saucedo-Martinez,
Environmental Microbiology Laboratory, Chemical-Biological Research Institute, Ed-B3, University City, México.

Liliana Marquez-Benavides,
Solid Waste and Energy Group, Institute of Agricultural and Forestry Research. Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo. Fco J, Mujica s/n Col Felicitas del Rio, CP58030, Morelia, Michoacan, México.

Juan Manuel Sánchez-Yáñez,
Environmental Microbiology Laboratory, Chemical-Biological Research Institute, Ed-B3, University City, México.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/RHST-V6/article/view/11344