The Holomorphic Quantum: A Systems Approach to Understanding the Nature of Reality | Chapter 6 | Newest Updates in Physical Science Research Vol. 15

 Quantum Mechanics is so titled because it is primarily concerned with the mechanics of solving probability problems as they relate to the enigmatic impact of measurement that causes energy to manifest as quantum particle-waves. A quantum particle is easy to imagine, but a “probability wave” appears to be impossible to visualise, thus there has never been a clear understanding of what quantum physics reveals us – or should tell us – about the underlying core of reality. Fortunately, a new approach that approaches the enigma of life like a locking system and gives not only the key, but also the keyhole and the direction in which to turn it has been identified and confirmed to work in biology. The systems approach is explained in this paper, along with some background information on how it has blended parts of substance philosophy with process philosophy and evolved into a potent instrument for application in science. It is utilised to describe the translation of implicit energy into an explicit space-time quantum domain superimposed on a relativistic time-space background in this case. These two "products" are then linked to two of the four blocks in a standard control-system design (input and output). (Input, transfer function, output, and feedback function are the four blocks.) They can be depicted explicitly on the space versus time plot as a map of motion because they are explicit. We underline that this is a map - an explicit projection of an implicit function represented as an implicit domain (in this case, a plot of space vs time is a projection of the variance we term motion) (a perpendicular dimension). We see that a feedback function is the same as, and so entails, a back-projection or reflection back "up" into that "implicate order." The transfer function and feedback function in the control system are therefore associated with these two implicit functions (projection and reflection).

We note that each axis of the space-time domain is scaled by standard "deviations," which define the explicit scales, and that the motion function is related to the probability wave by the word used in statistics – the "variance" of a statistical distribution. Because the square root of a variance is a standard deviation, the square space that translates as a relativistic scalar plot (a conventional Cartesian coordinate system) of space versus time or "space-time" reflects one of two square roots of the implicit variance we call motion. Our measures of this area, in essence, keep us grounded in physical reality. This coordinate system, on the other hand, is revealed to be only the root – a component of a "whole system" that contains a non-physical implicit feedback function. The feedback function is correlated with the explicit domain's "reflection," i.e. inverse-space and inverse-time, which is represented as a phase space termed time-space and a unit of spatial frequency versus temporal frequency.

These frequency representations are proven to be the two well-known quantum energy equations from quantum physics, and they are used to identify energy-space as "the quantum domain" within, or superimposed on, the background "relativistic domain," which is a scalar space. At the moment where both scales equal “1,” these two domains are demonstrated to be connected. This model is a graphical representation of an energy-momentum tensor in the language of quantum field theory, and as a visual model, it provides a clear conceptual interpretation of complexity theory, in which reality is expressed as the superposition of a self-organizing control system that convolves with a dissipative open system or "sea of disorder" and transforms it into physik. The mathematically rigorous explanation On Symmetry and the Reality of Holomorphic Hartree–Fock Wavefunctions [1] or the Kohn-Sham Density Functional Theory [2] is akin to this “holomorphic systems approach,” but it is considerably easier and visually illustrative. Furthermore, by defining the equivalence of space and time as S=Tc2, and presenting it geometrically to be the exact same relation as the mass-energy equivalence equation E=mc2, it indicates that the inquiry regarding the beginning of time is a question fallacy. The model also demonstrates that quantized energy (also known as self-consistent fields or SCF) projects as a characteristic, allowing the solution to the particle-wave duality "problem" to be visualised as a shift in perspective. It's the shift in perspective that causes the particle-like and wave-like properties to appear as "emerging" – similar to how an item appears when visualised from two separate perspectives — at rest with respect to one's own body but in motion with respect to another "moving" body.

The technique also exposes how the transfer function and feedback function interact to modify matter, completing the control system by adding the fourth component (the Controller) and transforming it into a self-organizing, self-sensing system that can perceive itself explicitly and implicitly. It's easy to see how this relates to biological systems.

Author (S) Details

Theodore J. St. John
U. S. Navy Nuclear Submarine Corps and Medical Service Corps (Retired), USA.

View Book :- https://stm.bookpi.org/NUPSR-V15/article/view/3477