Einstein assumed the “principle of relativity” when
constructing the special theory of relativity (STR).
He claimed that all inertial frames are equivalent, and
that it is impossible to discriminate between
inertial frames.
However, among the coordinate systems regarded by
Einstein as inertial frames, there are some in
which light propagates isotropically, and some in which
light propagates anisotropically. A method has
been found which discriminates between these.
The author has already pointed out that there are
problems with the STR, but this paper first
examines the "principle of constancy of light
speed" assumed by Einstein in order to determine the
cause of violation of the STR.
Next, this paper discusses the “triplet thought
experiment” in which accelerated motion is eliminated
from the famous twin paradox thought
experiment of the STR. Here the inertial frames regarded as
equivalent by the STR are identified as “classically
stationary frames ” and “classically moving
frames ” First, an observer M in frame performs the
triplet thought experiment, and it is
confirmed that the delay in time which elapses in the
moving frame agrees with the predictions of the
STR. Next, an observer in rocket A (Scl ¢ ) performs the triplet thought
experiment, and observes the
same time delay.
This paper elucidates a system whereby symmetrical
experiment results can be obtained, even if the
two coordinate systems are not equivalent. The
traditional interpretation of the twin paradox must be
revised.
Author(s) Details
Koshun Suto
Independent Researcher, 5-24, Oote-Town, Isesaki, Japan.
View Book :- https://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/238
No comments:
Post a Comment