This study checks the nature or extent of research cooperation between the punishments of clinical psychology and talk-language-trial in India. It covers a purposive sample of 90 from 710 published research documents on designated districts of psychosocial difficulties that appeared fully prior books of an indexed national chronicle for an equal number of years. A cooperation index based on the frequency, flow, or pattern of authorship for research gifts within the indicated timelines was more created, in addition to a qualitative examination of average research interests across the two fields. Multiple authorships in the unchanging profession indicate collaboration, and those with different professions are deemed true cooperation. The findings display that two-thirds of surveyed research documents are published by distinct authors (67.77%), leaving <1% of the publications by 3-4 authors. While the frequency of individual paper by one biographer is high, with depressed collaboration indications (CI: 0.322), a review of mutual research interests reveals that stammer, prevalence dossier for communication disorders, test development, re-confirmation, and norm change are the most often surveyed topics. Before last on the need for developing a problem-concentrated multi-authorship calendar for research in the near future, the merits, demerits, and common hurdles to bury-disciplinary cooperation are examined.
Author(s) Details:
S. Venkatesan,
Clinical
Psychology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore: 570006,
Karnataka, India.
Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/CIMMS-V9/article/view/8786
No comments:
Post a Comment