Saturday, 5 November 2022

Assessing the Characteristics of Rural Savings Systems and Their Impacts on Rural Livelihoods of Selected Districts of Sierra Leone| Chapter 3 | Research Highlights in Agricultural Sciences Vol. 4

 Rural society savings systems are ultimate expected group providing support to members in African, Asian, Caribbean, and Indian countries. Rural Community Savings systems are individual of the solutions to authorizing their members to generate more pay in many parts of West African countries. This study attempts to evaluate the characteristics of rural society savings wholes and their impacts on rural livelihood in picked districts of Sierra Leone. The researchers selected three objectives, (1) recognize the personal and socio-demographic traits of rural tenants (savings members and non-stockpiles members) that influence partnership in rural community funds systems, and (2) recognize the factors, operational environments and modalities of the stockpiles systems, and (3) assess the impact of the country community savings schemes on the livelihood of country dwellers in selected sectors of Sierra Leone. The study adopted a cross-divided design. The population consists of stockpiles members and non-funds in Bo, Bombali and Kenema Districts. The population size was 897, of which 810 harvests with an equivalent of 810 non-harvests, giving a sample size of 1,620 country dwellers. Two sets of pretested questionnaires and focus group guides accompanying a reliability of 0.75 were executed using KoBoCollect v.1.14.0a software; analysed dossier using plain frequencies, logit regression and inclination score match models. Participation in the funds program positively impacted miscellaneous rural society. The study reveals a positive and well statistically significant connection between the age of the savings appendage and their Participation in RCSS at a one percent meaning level (P=0.008). All other belongings being constant, as the ages of the savings appendage increase, they are more likely to take part in the rural community stockpiles system. Household length has a positive and statistically significant friendship with the anticipation of Participation in the RCSS (P=0.000) at a one percent meaningful level. This result reveals that as household size increases, their uncovering to consumption shock again increases, making them more likely to use microfinance possessions to normalize their uncovering to shocks and risks. Respondents' livestock ownership accompanied a positive and statistically important relationship with the chance of participating in stockpiles groups at a 5 percent significance level (P=0.008). In the logit reversion, contrary to beliefs, microenterprises' ownership had a statistically significant negative anticipation of borrowing from savings groups. Respondents acknowledge microenterprises were fewer borrowers. Moreover, they share more in savings groups compared to those the one do not own microenterprises. The type of loan, livestock control, and receipt of income from transitory employment influence participation. Participants' access to power, microenterprise ownership, and opposing events significantly influence the determinations to participate in savings groups. Rural society savings plans should conduct basic training on funds and financial administration within their communities to raise knowledge. 2. Rural community stockpiles groups should conduct in-service preparation programmes to fully describe the guiding characteristics of the movements of the rural community stockpiles systems. Operational approaches are appropriately monitored for their efficiency and let enrollment be committed to guiding acts of the savings groups in realizing the main objectives. 3. The savings arrangement should design sharing time to authorize members to use their share decrease best and make more efforts to provide for those categories of rural tenants, reducing the reliance rate within the rural societies. 4. The rural society savings systems bear strategize to involve many non-saving members in the organisation, and exercise programmes should, considerably, address the fundamental financial intermediation of the rural societies in Sierra Leone.

Author(s) Details:

Mohamed Paul Ngegba,
Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Njala Campus, Sierra Leone.

James Kamara,
Department of Research and Extension, Ministry of Agriculture, Bomi County Office, Liberia.

Muctar Foday Koroma,
Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Njala Campus, Sierra Leone.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/RHAS-V4/article/view/8578


No comments:

Post a Comment