On the basis of radioactive phenomena (weak
force), Georges Lemaitre conceives the primordial universe as a 'special
super-dense quantum' as early as 1927, the disintegration of which gave birth
to all the present components of the universe[1,2]. Using quantum mechanics,
from the point of view of quantum theory, he proposes to explain the origins of
the universe. He thinks that he will find the manifestation of the initial
fragmentation in the cosmic rays. However, the theory of the primaeval atom
(cold big bang) had no equation to endorse it and was not maintained,
irrespective of the adopted cosmology. He fell back on the Friedmann-Einstein
equation, like all other cosmologists, with a repulsive cosmological constant
that propels expansion into infinity, according to supernova observations at
the end of the millennium. We are juxtaposing our "quantum cosmology"
equation to this relativistic cosmology equation. In an earlier paper[3], we
have already proposed this equation, which has its origins in quantum mechanics
and matches the hypothesis of the "primaeval atom" by Lemaitre. It is
an equation in which the notion of matter-space-time is related mathematically;
space-time is also bound by gravitation and electromagnetism. It describes a
process that demonstrates how speed, time , distance, matter and energy are
associated. We are guided to ascertain that two distinct manifestations of a
single underlying phenomenon are gravity and electricity: electrogravitation.
For the first time, cosmological time is incorporated into a "cosmological
equation," known as a real physical entity, which makes what we know about
time (its origin, its flow ...), matter, and space coherent. In addition, a
continuously decelerated expansion is suggested by the equation. The concentration
of the material medium and the value of the vacuum's decreasing energy lead to
the gradual increase of the positive pressure that is responsible for the
expansion 's rising deceleration. Does this mean that our equation leads us
eventually to the entire cosmos' theory of the primaeval atom? Certainly not,
as both the hot Gamow model and the cold Lemaître model are included in our
model. For our model, the term "dynamic evolution" (used initially by
specialists for big bang models) is fitting since there is both an explosive
origin and a disintegration of a hyper-dense matter in the expansion. The
observation of radiation from the cosmic microwave background has confirmed the
hot big bang model achieved by Gamow and his team. The projected light
prevailed over Lemaitre 's proposed primitive cosmic rays (particles). However,
we assume that Lemaitre was also correct. In addition to not satisfying the
basic standards of science, the so-called big-bang hypothesis (singular
cataclysmic explosion) is refuted by many results that are ignored. The work of
Armenian astronomers, for instance, has persuaded us that the origin of cosmic
particles derives not only from the eruption of supernovae, but also from the
separation of radio galaxies, not only from the death of the universe, but also
from the birth of them.
Author(s) Details
Russell Bagdoo
Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville,
Quebec, Canada.
View Book :- https://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/301
Thursday, 5 November 2020
The World in an Equation: A Reappraisal of the Lemaître’s Primeval Cosmic Rays
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment