Proprioception, a crucial component of motor control, can significantly affect function in a range of clinical categories when it is compromised or lost. This systematic study was conducted to identify proprioceptive acuity measurement methods that are clinically applicable. Proprioception is the sensory feedback that supports joint stability, postural balance, and muscle awareness. This systematic review's main objective was to identify and classify the techniques that have been created and applied to gauge proprioceptive accuracy. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were among the databases used, along with the following search engines and databases: Cochrane database, SCIRE, PEDro, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ERIC. The TTDPM method has a higher conceptual purity but a lower relative ecological validity. The AMEDA technique appears to have stronger ecological validity as well as relatively higher test and data validity, whereas JPR tests have lower relative test validity but are more therapeutically feasible.
Author(s) Details:
Jaykumar Soni,
College of Physiotherapy, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, India.
Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/CPMS-V11/article/view/8034
No comments:
Post a Comment