Showing posts with label symbolism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label symbolism. Show all posts

Sunday, 7 December 2025

Graffiti as a Didactic Tool: Promoting Students’ Critical Thinking, Creativity and Social Awareness | Chapter 5 | Walls That Teach: Graffiti, Education and the Pedagogy of Resistance

 

Graffiti is now widely understood to be a powerful way to communicate, using both images and words to express complicated ideas. In educational settings, graffiti can allow students to understand and create messages that show who they are, what they care about, and their creative abilities. Social semiotics helps uncover the underlying structures and visual elements of graffiti, allowing teachers and students to analyse how meaning is constructed through images and symbols. Additionally, the symbolism in graffiti encourages discussions about students’ culture, identity, and perspectives on the world. In the context of subversion, Graffiti, often seen as a form of rebellion, has the power to question established rules, standards, and beliefs. The objective of this study is to examine the potential of graffiti as a didactic tool to enhance students’ critical thinking, creativity, and social awareness within educational settings. This research explores the potential of street art as a teaching method in literature classes, focusing on its meanings, symbolism, and challenging nature. Using theories about signs and challenging norms, the study looks at how street art can improve students' ability to think critically, be imaginative, and understand social issues. The research, carried out in Gweru urban, involved interviews with high school students and teachers, and the information gathered was analysed to identify key themes. The results show that street art offers a space for important expression, encourages involvement and imagination, and promotes thinking about social and cultural issues. One challenge observed was that students sometimes focused more on how the art looked than on its underlying meaning. However, the study found that providing clear guidance and support can make teaching with street art more effective. Based on these findings, the research suggests that educators regularly include activities based on street art in their literature lessons. This could be a valuable way to develop students' critical thinking, creative skills, and awareness of their role in society. Effective strategies include guiding students to analyse the meaning of the art, encouraging group interpretation, facilitating creative projects, and holding discussions about the context of the art. Assessment methods could include reflective writing, group presentations, analytical papers, and projects. Overall, this study emphasises the positive impact that street art can have on literature education. It demonstrates how it connects creative expression with critical thinking and social awareness. These findings offer practical advice for teachers, curriculum developers, and policymakers who are looking for new ways to improve teaching and learning.

Author(s) Details

Jones Maeresera
University of Technology and Arts of Byumba, Rwanda.

 

Please see the book here :- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mono/978-93-47485-01-5/CH5

Thursday, 2 November 2023

Artificial Intelligence, a Singular Technology: Paradigms, and Models | Chapter 2 | Current Innovations in Chemical and Materials Sciences Vol. 2

 Artificial intelligence is a legitimate driver of the controlled and technological development, accompanying a difficult skyline to assess. This chapter inquires to give a brief survey of this science and electronics in order to comprehend their present condition and potential in the near future. Artificial intelligence is the imitation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially calculating systems. Specific uses of AI include expert systems, robotics, speech acknowledgment and machine apparition. A challenging horizon to forecast, artificial intelligence is a real force behind technological and scientific progress. The chapter tries to resolve the various paradigms, models, and approaches, that has been discoursing machine intelligence. To this end, the symbolic current, the connectionist model of affecting animate nerve organs networks, and the fuzzy cognitive maps are intentional, to then proceed to analyze the so-called computational knowledge, and the sub-representative current. From a chronological viewpoint, three paradigms in the development of machine intelligence are considered: the beginning or mono-block, the current paradigm of distributed machine intelligence, and the starting example of generative artificial intelligence. The first mainly resulted incompetent systems, that are quite useful, and the second in multi-power systems and added models. To make the usage and productiveness of these systems and models clear, various examples are provided. Finally, few information on the exertions being made to try to mix all current methodologies is provided, and a brief indicator regarding the after second paradigm, generative machine intelligence, is also contained.

Author(s) Details:

Mohamed El Alami,
Université Abdelmalek Essaâdi/Ecole Nationale de Sciences Appliquées (ENSAT), Tanger, B.P. 2117 Tétouan, Morocco.

Ana Lilia Laureano-Cruces,
Departamento de Sistemas/Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco, México City, 02128, México and Laboratoire Informatique d’Avignon, France.

Fernando de Arriaga,
Departamento de Matemática Aplicada a las Tecnologías de la Información/Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, 28660, Spain.

Javier Ramírez-Rodríguez,
Departamento de Sistemas/Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco, México City, 02128, México and Laboratoire Informatique d’Avignon, France.

Ma. de Lourdes Sánchez-Guerrero,
Departamento de Sistemas/Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco, México City, 02128, México.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/CICMS-V2/article/view/12324

Thursday, 27 July 2023

Indicators Framework for the Influence of Political Power in Building an Image of Architecture, Case Study: The Government Buildings | Chapter 5| Recent Trends in Arts and Social Studies Vol. 5

Political power is a significant factor in the ideological and intellectual change of architectural production. This article aims to determine the impact of the state's political ideology on shaping architecture in different countries. In this context, the manuscript is concerned with reviewing the previous literature on the essential indicator concept of political power and its impact on shaping the image of architecture according to the rules, patterns, and traditions of society. This study achieved a proposed framework for indicators that are easy to apply on several international and Arab governmental buildings to reflect the role of the authority in building the architectural image and identity of those buildings and their reflection on the city. This paper adopts a qualitative research strategy based on the case study methodology. The test of criteria derived from the theoretical framework includes examining the symbolic meanings embodied in the physical characteristics of a sample of selected Arab and international government buildings. The results show how the country's culture and the time factor affected the way symbolism is displayed and how government buildings worked as a social and political tool to set a new form for the relationship between architecture, power, and the people through an insight into the political and cultural role of architecture. The research recommends the importance of investing in the local heritage and the capabilities of advanced technology as a basis for expressing the influence of the political authority in building a clear architectural image of the buildings and the city, As well as focusing on finding the symbolic aspect in parallel with finding the form to create images that evoke the feelings of the recipient, which reflect positively on the knowledge of the ruler and the people about the importance of those inherited values.

Author(s) Details:

Ghada Ragheb,

Architectural Engineering Department, Pharos University in Alexandria, Egypt.

Naira Zaky,

Architectural Engineering Department, Pharos University in Alexandria, Egypt.

Aisha Awad,

Architectural Engineering Department, Pharos University in Alexandria, Egypt.

Alaa El-Deghady,

Architectural Engineering Department, Pharos University in Alexandria, Egypt.

Horuyra Ismaiel,

Architectural Engineering Department, Pharos University in Alexandria, Egypt.

Sherif Hosni,

Architectural Engineering Department, Pharos University in Alexandria, Egypt.

Maha Abd El-Wahab,

Architectural Engineering Department, Pharos University in Alexandria, Egypt.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/RTASS-V5/article/view/11371