How Far Light Travels before Dropping Below the Visible Frequency Range| Chapter 3 | New Frontiers in Physical Science Research Vol. 6

 The purpose concerning this study search out take calculations suggesting the maximum distance light travels before it attenuates beneath the seeable commonness range, that is, drops not accessible to view. The commonness of light evenly decreases as it traverses enormous distances presage (attenuates). This wonder is famous as a redshift cause apparent light has a weakness to shift toward the coral end of the range. There sooner or later comes a point at that light drops beneath the coral end of the range and is not any more seeable to us. When redshift is correctly assumed as debilitation, allure calculations allow us to reckon at what distance light drops beneath the electromagnetic frequencies. Beyond this confining distance, skilled are innumerable a lot of galaxies that are hidden to us.

Author(s) Details:

David Rowland,
61 Sandstone Drive, Hanwell, New Brunswick E3E 0C3, Canada.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/NFPSR-V6/article/view/9209

Spacetime and General Relativity: A Novel Approach| Chapter 7 | New Trends in Physical Science Research Vol.4

Four-dimensional (Minkowski) spacetime is purely mathematical and has no practical application. Time is an abstract measurement of motion and events that occur in three dimensions. It is impossible to extract nonphysical time from three-dimensional space and project it onto a fourth, ostensibly physical axis with a separate set of reference points. Spacetime does not exist, does not curve, and has no gravitational interaction. General relativity is severely flawed because Einstein predicated his geometric theory of gravity (general relativity) solely on this incorrect spacetime foundation. Geometry is the branch of mathematics that deals with the characteristics and relationships of points, lines, surfaces, and objects' relative positions. Mathematics is a sort of measuring that is intellectual rather than physical. Because geometry cannot cause or be influenced by anything in physical reality, Einstein's geometric theory of gravity fails. Because it assumes that a real force (gravity) interacts with an abstraction (geometry) that has no actual existence, general relativity fails. This chapter conclusively refutes both Minkowski spacetime and general relativity.

Author(s) Details:

David Rowland,
61 Sandstone Drive, Hanwell NB, E3E 0C3, Canada.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/NTPSR-V4/article/view/6934

Astrophysics and Logic Often Conflict| Chapter 13 | New Trends in Physical Science Research Vol. 2

The science of logic is the study of reasoning, proof, and validity. This is the first research to use rigorous logical analysis to examine eight popular astrophysical ideas. The following cosmological theories are hereby declared invalid due to multiple false assumptions, faulty reasoning, and mathematical oversights: big bang theory, Hubble's law, general relativity, gravitational wave theory, dark matter theory, dark energy theory, Higgs boson theory, and Doppler-redshift theory. What is intellectually impossible is physically impossible as well.

Author(s) Details:

David Rowland,
61 Sandstone Drive, Hanwell, New Brunswick E3E 0C3, Canada.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/NTPSR-V2/article/view/6625

Something is Seriously Wrong with Cosmology | Chapter 09 | Research Developments in Science and Technology Vol. 1

 This study investigates and reports on a number of scientific and mathematical flaws that, taken together, have resulted in a widely held understanding of the universe that is significantly incorrect. Current accepted astrophysics has created an extensive network of hypotheses that are lacking foundation due to a fundamental cosmological mistake dating back to 1915. The legendary big bang could not have occurred, galaxies are not colliding, we are not on a collision path with Andromeda, and dark matter and dark energy are both fictitious concepts. General relativity has become the accepted explanation for gravity as a result of two mathematical errors dating back to 1915. This geometric explanation of gravity, however, is fatally faulty. There is no such thing as four-dimensional spacetime, and it does not curve or interact with gravity. Gravitational waves do not exist, and gravity does not bend light. This study finds that the following hypotheses are false: big bang theory, Hubble’s law, expansion theory, 4-D spacetime, general relativity, dark matter, dark energy, cosmic microwave background theory, and gravitational waves. The cosmos is an immense, eternal expanse with no beginning or end and no boundaries of any kind.

Author(S) Details

D. Rowland
61 Sandstone Drive, Hanwell, New Brunswick E3E 0C3 Canada.

View Book:- https://stm.bookpi.org/RDST-V1/article/view/6325

An Introduction to the Concept of Immanence as a Physical Quantity: An Approach towards Information & Effect | Chapter 2 | Newest Updates in Physical Science Research Vol. 14

 The physical quantity of immanence is introduced and applied, allowing for a more full comprehension of effect. In mathematical formulations, the complementary co-factors of information and immanence are presented as the source and result of the thermodynamic effect, respectively. As a result, the concept of immanence helps to clarify the relationship between the concepts of information and reality, and leads to the derivative of the principle of immanence development, which may be applied to astrophysical problems like the information paradox (i.e., the question of information loss regarding black holes).

Author(s) Details

Friedhelm M. Jöge
Schulstrasse 57, D-31812 Bad Pyrmont, Germany.

View Book :- https://stm.bookpi.org/NUPSR-V14/article/view/3156

The Big Bang Never Happened: Conclusive Proof | Chapter 8 | Newest Updates in Physical Science Research Vol. 13

 The prevailing assumption for nearly a century has been that the universe was created by a big bang singularity. This speculative occurrence is an impossibility that has only become a well-established belief due to a basic scientific inaccuracy that few have questioned until now. This article shows why the universe could not have started from a singularity, that galaxies are not receding from the Milky Way, and that we are not on the verge of colliding with other galaxies. Andromeda, of course. Edwin Hubble made a number of errors, including incorrect assumptions and major miscalculations. The Big Bang Theory assumes that the cosmos appeared out of nowhere. This concept challenges physics as well as logic, the science of thought and reasoning. Nothing can be the root of a problem. “The concept that there might be nothing that preceded something offends reason itself,” Aristotle is said to have said.

Author(s) Details

David Rowland
Independent Researcher, Canada.

View Book :- https://stm.bookpi.org/NUPSR-V13/article/view/2926

What We Know about the Universe that is Not So: Undoing a Century of Errors | Book Publisher International

 The prevailing assumption for nearly a century has been that the universe was created by a big bang singularity. This speculative occurrence is an impossibility that has only become a well-established belief due to a basic scientific inaccuracy that few have questioned until now. The cosmos could not have formed from any singularity, according to this book, which gives both logical proof and scientific evidence. Hubble's law, which assumes that galaxies are moving away from Earth at velocities proportionate to their distance, is widely regarded as the definitive proof that the universe is expanding. Hubble's law is severely defective due to erroneous assumptions, weak logic, and data that appears to have been fabricated. Edwin Hubble formed the erroneous assumption that nebulae are rushing away from one other, then discovered the mathematics to back up his assertion. In modern physics, general relativity (GR) is the geometric theory of gravity that has come to be acknowledged as the standard definition of gravitation. Gravity, according to GR, is the outcome of large objects distorting four-dimensional spacetime geometrically. The more mass in a body that provides gravity, the greater the claimed distortion. This distortion is said to alter the trajectory of moving objects in space, as well as the pathways of light rays passing close to huge objects. GR is, unfortunately, a terminally defective hypothesis based on logical mistakes, erroneous assumptions, and empirical misinterpretation. Geometric spacetime does not exist, it does not curve, and it cannot interact with gravity in any way.

Author(s) Details

David Rowland
Independent Researcher, Canada and Member of Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, Canada and Affiliate of Canadian Association of Physicists, Canada.

View Book:- https://stm.bookpi.org/WWKUNSUCE/article/view/2128