Genesis, Implementation and Continuous Enforcement of Laws of Nature: Deeper Understanding Needed | Chapter 5 | Contemporary Perspective on Science, Technology and Research Vol. 7

British theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking argued that ‘God did not create the universe and the "Big Bang" was an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics.’ In "The Grand Design," (2010) co-authored with U.S. physicist Leonard Mlodinow, Hawking said that a new series of theories made a creator of the universe redundant; "Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist….It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going."

 

The implications of his ideas reflect the reality of the emerging corporate-led world order. It is unfortunate that the opposition to the existence of God has become such a precondition for the think-tank of the New World Order that scientists who oppose God are being given all the attention, and those who argue against atheism are normally ignored. Hawking says that the creation of the universe is the automatic consequence of the laws of nature. But the question arises: What is the genesis of these laws and how they are being enforced in such a huge universe, where the light, which is regarded by current Physics, as the fastest moving entity, takes billions of years to travel from one end to the other. The aims/objectives of this paper are to:

 

Highlight the fact that the Laws of Nature (including the Four Fundamental Forces) came before the beginning of the creation and expansion of the matter.

·         Highlight the fact that there has hardly been any discussion on why and how these Laws began to appear.

·         Highlight the fact that there has to be a theorisation on the source of these laws;

·         There has to be a theorisation on what is behind the successful implementation of these laws for billions of years in such a massive universe.

·         To ask how can there be Laws without any Lawmakers and how can they be implemented and enforced without anyone playing the ultimate role.

Author(s) Details:

Javed Jamil,
Yenepoya University, Mangalore, India.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/CPSTR-V7/article/view/13742

Redefining Big Bang Cosmology with a Fresh Perspective | Chapter 10 | Current Perspective to Physical Science Research Vol. 4

 Professed the homogeneity and isotropy of the universe at large sizes is a challenging task. This episode aims to explore the impact of matter distribution in uniformity up to the last uneven surface time within the foundation of spatially homogeneous yet anisotropic models. These models produce anisotropies on large bent scales (larger than 𝜗 > 2°) that closely mirror those found in the conventional FriedmannLemaitre-Robertson-Hiker (FLRW) geometries.Regarding these anisotropic models, the imprint abandoned on the cosmic microwave history radiation on account of primordial density vacillations, manifested as fractional hotness variations, understands the same expression as in FLRW models. Just, under adiabatic initial conditions, we obey the retrieval of the simple Sachs-Wolfe effect, as the anisotropy in the overall cosmic expansion debris minimal concurrently with an activity of the last scattering surface.This finding joins with prior research on these anisotropic models, signifying their gradual "isotropization" in a way where observational qualities from FLRW models become imperceptible, in order that the Hubble parameters ahead orthogonal directions are nearly equal to their current principles. In conclusion, the observation of Sachs-Wolfe effect level does not permit us to distinguish between FLRW models and the anisotropic Kantowski-Sachs and Bianchi type-III models. This work also settled upper bounds on the anisotropic limits' present-day values established COBE observations.

Author(s) Details:

Paulo Aguiar,
Universidade Lusíada do Porto, Rua de Moçambique 21 e 71, 4100-348 Porto, Portugal.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/CPPSR-V4/article/view/12635

Something is Seriously Wrong with Cosmology | Chapter 09 | Research Developments in Science and Technology Vol. 1

 This study investigates and reports on a number of scientific and mathematical flaws that, taken together, have resulted in a widely held understanding of the universe that is significantly incorrect. Current accepted astrophysics has created an extensive network of hypotheses that are lacking foundation due to a fundamental cosmological mistake dating back to 1915. The legendary big bang could not have occurred, galaxies are not colliding, we are not on a collision path with Andromeda, and dark matter and dark energy are both fictitious concepts. General relativity has become the accepted explanation for gravity as a result of two mathematical errors dating back to 1915. This geometric explanation of gravity, however, is fatally faulty. There is no such thing as four-dimensional spacetime, and it does not curve or interact with gravity. Gravitational waves do not exist, and gravity does not bend light. This study finds that the following hypotheses are false: big bang theory, Hubble’s law, expansion theory, 4-D spacetime, general relativity, dark matter, dark energy, cosmic microwave background theory, and gravitational waves. The cosmos is an immense, eternal expanse with no beginning or end and no boundaries of any kind.

Author(S) Details

D. Rowland
61 Sandstone Drive, Hanwell, New Brunswick E3E 0C3 Canada.

View Book:- https://stm.bookpi.org/RDST-V1/article/view/6325

The Big Bang Never Happened: Conclusive Proof | Chapter 8 | Newest Updates in Physical Science Research Vol. 13

 The prevailing assumption for nearly a century has been that the universe was created by a big bang singularity. This speculative occurrence is an impossibility that has only become a well-established belief due to a basic scientific inaccuracy that few have questioned until now. This article shows why the universe could not have started from a singularity, that galaxies are not receding from the Milky Way, and that we are not on the verge of colliding with other galaxies. Andromeda, of course. Edwin Hubble made a number of errors, including incorrect assumptions and major miscalculations. The Big Bang Theory assumes that the cosmos appeared out of nowhere. This concept challenges physics as well as logic, the science of thought and reasoning. Nothing can be the root of a problem. “The concept that there might be nothing that preceded something offends reason itself,” Aristotle is said to have said.

Author(s) Details

David Rowland
Independent Researcher, Canada.

View Book :- https://stm.bookpi.org/NUPSR-V13/article/view/2926

What We Know about the Universe that is Not So: Undoing a Century of Errors | Book Publisher International

 The prevailing assumption for nearly a century has been that the universe was created by a big bang singularity. This speculative occurrence is an impossibility that has only become a well-established belief due to a basic scientific inaccuracy that few have questioned until now. The cosmos could not have formed from any singularity, according to this book, which gives both logical proof and scientific evidence. Hubble's law, which assumes that galaxies are moving away from Earth at velocities proportionate to their distance, is widely regarded as the definitive proof that the universe is expanding. Hubble's law is severely defective due to erroneous assumptions, weak logic, and data that appears to have been fabricated. Edwin Hubble formed the erroneous assumption that nebulae are rushing away from one other, then discovered the mathematics to back up his assertion. In modern physics, general relativity (GR) is the geometric theory of gravity that has come to be acknowledged as the standard definition of gravitation. Gravity, according to GR, is the outcome of large objects distorting four-dimensional spacetime geometrically. The more mass in a body that provides gravity, the greater the claimed distortion. This distortion is said to alter the trajectory of moving objects in space, as well as the pathways of light rays passing close to huge objects. GR is, unfortunately, a terminally defective hypothesis based on logical mistakes, erroneous assumptions, and empirical misinterpretation. Geometric spacetime does not exist, it does not curve, and it cannot interact with gravity in any way.

Author(s) Details

David Rowland
Independent Researcher, Canada and Member of Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, Canada and Affiliate of Canadian Association of Physicists, Canada.

View Book:- https://stm.bookpi.org/WWKUNSUCE/article/view/2128

Physics Essay: Observation on Six Baseless and Irrational Problems in Modern Cosmology | Chapter 7 | New Insights into Physical Science Vol. 5

 

Analyzes the Big Bang theory, recession of galaxies, Hubble's law, multi-dimensional space, curved
space and a black hole in modern cosmology and points out that these six theories are all baseless
and irrational, contrary to classical science. Promotes the use of the plain view of the universe - the
materialist view of space–time-mass-energy to study the universe. The observations and
understanding of the universe are very limited now. Cosmology should be realistic, not based on
irrational models.

Author(s) Details
 
Zifeng Li
Petroleum Engineering Department, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, China.

View Book :- https://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/245