Purpose: To equate the computerized Aniseikonia Inspector, translation 3, with the Aniseikonia Smart Optometry, report 3.6, for the measurement of aniseikonia.Methods: 103 issues, ages 33 to 90 age, who had earlier undergone mutual cataract enucleation (sequential), outside complications, accompanying monofocal IOL implantation, the one had postoperatively anisometropia in spherical equivalent effective or degree 1.00D, with common binocular vision and standard vision were selected for the study. The aniseikonia was calculated with the Aniseikonia Inspector, Version 3, and the Aniseikonia Smart Optometry, interpretation 3.6, with their usual refractive correction from during the whole of. Results: In level aniseikonia analysis, the middle of the difference middle from two points Aniseikonia Inspector 3 and Smart Optometry measurements was 2% in the anisometropia group and 1% in the control group. Horizontal principles were statistically equal in both (p-worth = 0.745; p-value = 0.587). The mean distinctness was 2.05% in the anisometropia group 1.63% in the control group while the percentage of distinctnesses out of surplus of compromise adopted was 0.08% in the anisometropia group and 0.04% in the control group. In upright aniseikonia analysis, the middle of the difference 'tween Aniseikonia Inspector 3 and Smart Optometry measurements was 1.45% in the anisometropia group and 1% in the control group. Vertical principles were statistically equal in both (p-advantage = 0.574; p-value = 0.563). The mean dissimilarity was 2.06% in the anisometropia group 1.89% the control group while the portion of differences at a distance the limits of understanding adopted was 0.05% in the anisometropia group and 0.10% in the control group.Conclusions: Under the environments of this study, likely the high grade of concurrence between Smart Optometry and Aniseikonia Inspector for aniseikonia amount, Smart Optometry’s Aniseikonia Test could be deliberate a right alternative for clinical use. More studies are wanted to validate this order in other age groups.
Author(s) Details:
João Pedro Gurres,
Department
of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São
Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo
Tannous,
Department
of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São
Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel Dantas,
Department of Computer, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju,
Brazil.
David Tayah,
Department of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Hospital das
Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Carricondo,
Department
of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São
Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Milton
Ruiz Alves,
Department
of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São
Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/ACMMR-V3/article/view/12561
No comments:
Post a Comment