Aniseikonia Comparison as Measured by Aniseikonia Inspector, Version 3, and Aniseikonia Smart Optometry, Version 3.6 | Chapter 13 | Advanced Concepts in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 3

 Purpose: To equate the computerized Aniseikonia Inspector, translation 3, with the Aniseikonia Smart Optometry, report 3.6, for the measurement of aniseikonia.Methods: 103 issues, ages 33 to 90 age, who had earlier undergone mutual cataract enucleation (sequential), outside complications, accompanying monofocal IOL implantation, the one had postoperatively anisometropia in spherical equivalent effective or degree 1.00D, with common binocular vision and standard vision were selected for the study. The aniseikonia was calculated with the Aniseikonia Inspector, Version 3, and the Aniseikonia Smart Optometry, interpretation 3.6, with their usual refractive correction from during the whole of. Results: In level aniseikonia analysis, the middle of the difference middle from two points Aniseikonia Inspector 3 and Smart Optometry measurements was 2% in the anisometropia group and 1% in the control group. Horizontal principles were statistically equal in both (p-worth = 0.745; p-value = 0.587). The mean distinctness was 2.05% in the anisometropia group 1.63% in the control group while the percentage of distinctnesses out of surplus of compromise adopted was 0.08% in the anisometropia group and 0.04% in the control group. In upright aniseikonia analysis, the middle of the difference 'tween Aniseikonia Inspector 3 and Smart Optometry measurements was 1.45% in the anisometropia group and 1% in the control group. Vertical principles were statistically equal in both (p-advantage = 0.574; p-value = 0.563). The mean dissimilarity was 2.06% in the anisometropia group 1.89% the control group while the portion of differences at a distance the limits of understanding adopted was 0.05% in the anisometropia group and 0.10% in the control group.Conclusions: Under the environments of this study, likely the high grade of concurrence between Smart Optometry and Aniseikonia Inspector for aniseikonia amount, Smart Optometry’s Aniseikonia Test could be deliberate a right alternative for clinical use. More studies are wanted to validate this order in other age groups.

Author(s) Details:

João Pedro Gurres,
Department of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Marcelo Tannous,
Department of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Daniel Dantas,
Department of Computer, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.

David Tayah,
Department of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Pedro Carricondo,
Department of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Milton Ruiz Alves,
Department of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/ACMMR-V3/article/view/12561

A Comparative Study on Stereopsis, Aniseikonia, and Associated Symptoms in Patients with Bilateral Pseudophakia with and without Anisometropia | Chapter 12 | Current Practice in Medical Science Vol. 11

 In order to investigate stereopsis, aniseikonia, and associated symptoms, the study examined bilateral pseudophakia with and without anisometropia. Patients with senile cataracts who had previously been scheduled for phacoemulsification with an IOL implant in both eyes were included in this cross-sectional study. Patients were split into two groups: the control group (n = 69) and the anisometropia group (n = 42), who had interocular post-surgical refraction differences of SE 1.00 D and SE 1.0 D, respectively. The statistical analysis of the data employed regression analysis, multivariate analysis, and univariate analysis models. An negligible difference (p = 0.766) separated the cataract surgery-induced aniseikonia in the control group (0.64% 1.41%) from the anisometropia group (0.62% 1.76%). The stereoacuity value was 1.95 0.17 log. revealed a significant difference (p 0.0001) between 2.12 0.22 log10 seconds of arc in the anisometropia group and 10 seconds of arc in the control group. With a negligible difference (p = 0.387), the mean score of symptoms related with aniseikonia was 1.41 0.46 in the control group and 1.47 0.45 in the aniso- metropia group. Axial length difference (18.06 percent), refractive error difference (44.53 percent), aniseikonia (25.71 percent), and IOL power difference all played independent roles in the anisometropia group's stereopsis prediction (11.71 percent). The study showed that stereopsis, aniseikonia, or other associated symptoms were not significantly worse in bilateral pseudo-dophakia with anisometropia smaller than 3D.

Author(s) Details:

Marcelo Tannous,
Departament of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology of HOSPITAL das Clinicas from University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Daniel Dantas,
Department of Computer, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Brazil.

Paulo Roberto de Arruda Zantut,
Departament of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology of HOSPITAL das Clinicas from University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

David Tayah,
Departament of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology of HOSPITAL das Clinicas from University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Pedro Carricondo,
Departament of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology of HOSPITAL das Clinicas from University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Amaryllis Avakian,
Departament of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology of HOSPITAL das Clinicas from University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Milton Ruiz Alves,
Departament of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology of HOSPITAL das Clinicas from University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/CPMS-V11/article/view/8036

Determining the Relationship between Anisometropia as Well as Visual Acuity, Aniseikonia and Stereopsis in the Absence of Strabismus | Chapter 9 | Current Practice in Medical Science Vol. 4

The goal of the current investigation was to ascertain the association between anisometropia type and its effects on stereopsis, aniseikonia, and monocular and binocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the absence of strabismus.

162 individuals with anisometropia and healthy eyes who had never undergone eye surgery or therapy for amblyopia participated in the research. They were divided into four groups: spherical hyperopic anisometropia (SHA, n = 31), spherical myopic anisometropia (SMA, n = 45), astigmatic or cylindrical hyperopic anisometropia (CIIA, n = 22), and astigmatic or cylindrical myopic anisometropia (CMA, n = 64) based on spherical and cylindrical components and spherical The control group included of patients (NA, n = 188) who did not have anisometropia. Aniseikonia, stereoacuity, and anisometropia were investigated as effects of anisometropia on monocular and binocular BCVA.

In comparison to the SHA, SMA, CMA, and CHA groups, the NA group showed a considerably lower Logiv4AR of BCVA in the three eyes. Additionally, the Logiv4AR of BCVA was substantially lower in the SMA group compared to the CIIA group (p 0.05). The descriptive values of anjseikonia, however, did not significantly differ across the groups (p = 0.052). In comparison to the CMA and SHA groups, the SMA groups showed substantially lower stereoacuity values in logio arc seconds (p 0.05). The relationship between ahiseikoria and stereoacuity scores in logl0 arc seconds was substantially positive in the anisometropia group (r = 0.160; p = 0.041). Stereopsis was correlated with the kind of anisometropia and poor monocular and binocular BCVA.

Author(s) Details:

David Tayah,

Universidade de Silo Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil and  Universidade Federal do Amazonas. Manaus, Brazil.

Marcelo Tannous,

Universidade de Silo Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Youssef Sabba Tayah,

Universidade Niltoo Lins, Maoaus, Arnazonas, Brazil.

Milton Ruiz Alves,

Universidade de Silo Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/CPMS-V4/article/view/7364