Climate change is almost exclusively discussed as a natural science
concern, despite the fact that it is becoming increasingly relevant every day.
As a result, scientists are debating what causes global warming and whether a
fundamental change to renewable energy would have a substantial impact. As
global warming worsens and the connection between human-caused emissions
becomes clearer, it's worth looking at how different countries have done in
terms of emissions over the last two decades. The aim of this paper is to show
that social scientists' opinions on the viability and desirability of a global
strategy should not be dismissed. Chemical and biological processes are, of
course, involved. Policy-making, on the other hand, is carried out by humans in
social, economic, and political environments. Only the governments of the world
will work together to stop global warming, but political theory's lessons on
opportunism, self-seeking through deception, and, more importantly, game theory
with asymmetric knowledge teach humility and scepticism about these prospects.
On one side of the state cooperation coin are chat, meetings, declarations, and
commitments, while on the other side are reneging, stealing, and opportunism
with guile.
Author (s) Details
Jan-Erik Lane
Institute of Public Policy in Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
View Book :- https://stm.bookpi.org/NHESS-V9/issue/view/52
No comments:
Post a Comment