Deforestation is seen as the conversion of forest land into
farms, ranches, or urban use; described as an illegal way of cutting down
forest trees for human utilisation. Developing alternatives to deforestation by
adopting sustainable farming practices can restore the lost forest, through
replanting trees in cleared areas or by simply allowing the ecosystem to
regenerate forest over time. The major aim of forest restoration is to return
it to its original state before it was cleared. The surface reflectance
indicated by vegetation obtained through remote sensing is distinct compared to
other surface bodies over a given scene. Utilising this distinct capability
allows the detection of the presence of vegetation. Normalised Difference
Vegetation Index (NDVI) compares the total amount of visible red light absorbed
with the amount of reflected near-infrared light by a surface. Soil Adjusted
Vegetation Index (SAVI) is somewhat similar to NDVI but adjusted by a factor
‘L’ to correct for soil noise effects, which impact the results. Therefore,
this study aimed to compare deforestation using NDVI and SAVI. The study was
conducted at Damaturu, Yobe State, Nigeria. Satellite imageries from Landsat
data were used to determine the deforestation areas, and the results were
compared to ascertain the discrepancies produced by the two methods. Spectral
information contained in each of the bands defined by a band in the
electromagnetic energy of interest was used for the energy level required in
the combination. Forest changes show effectively that there exists similarity
in their patterns of change measured with both techniques, but when the need to
obtain actual areas of change arises, one has to select the most appropriate
technique. The result of the comparison of forested area by the two methods
shows similar pattern and behavior, the net vegetation difference ranges from
+9.906% to +18.705%, and the forested area from +14.466% to 0.000% while the
open land, built-up and bare soil index cover shows a decrease over the years ranging
from -13.343% in 1990 to - 2.321% in 2013 respectively. However, NDVI shows a
lower area covered by vegetation and forest compared to SAVI, meaning that the
total area affected by forest changes by the two methods is not in any way the
same. The study recommended that good policies, along with alternative energy
sources to bio-fuel consumption, replacement of felled trees, and improved
agricultural practices, can help in the recovery of lost forested areas.
Author(s) Details
Ayuba Abubakar Fusami
Department of Surveying & Geo-informatics, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa
University, Bauchi, Nigeria.
Olivia Chidimma Nweze
Department of Surveying & Geo-informatics, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa
University, Bauchi, Nigeria.
Rekiya Hassan
Department of Surveying & Geo-informatics, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa
University, Bauchi, Nigeria.
Please see the book here :- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nhstc/v6/6654
No comments:
Post a Comment