Assessing the groundwater vulnerability to point source
pollution is a very contentious subject amongst researchers. This is because
many methods for assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution have been
modified and adapted to suit various contexts of study investigations and
conditions. This paper provides an overview of numerous intrinsic groundwater
vulnerability methods and how they were modified to improve their specificity,
efficiency, and effectiveness from previous studies across different parts of
the world. Depending on the context, groundwater vulnerability assessment
techniques utilise a range of complex biological, chemical, and physical
processes such as in Analogical Relation (AR) and Numerical Model Assessment
methods to simple weight-based criterion as in most common parametric methods
such as the AVI, DRASTIC, and the GOD method. Each of these vulnerability
assessment methods have their strengths and limitations which were reviewed in
this paper. Most groundwater vulnerability methods are based on selecting
between objective and subjective criterion for assessing the risk of
groundwater contamination and their modification to target specific
contaminants comes with a huge risk of bias. This paper also highlights the
importance of why the validation of groundwater vulnerability assessment
methods is critical in affirming the outcomes from groundwater assessment
methods.
Author(s) Details:
Silent Ruzvidzo,
Department of Life Science, Central University of Technology
Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Saheed A Oke,
Department
of Civil Engineering, Central University of Technology Bloemfontein, South
Africa.
Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/RAEGES-V1/article/view/14075
No comments:
Post a Comment