Objectives: This study aimed to highlight the influence of surgical experience in performing the abdominal hysterectomy and improving the linear curve of skills.
Background: Hysterectomy is the most frequently conducted
major gynecological surgical procedure. Several approaches to hysterectomy are
available to surgeons. It may be performed by an abdominal incision (total
abdominal hysterectomy [TAH]) or by less invasive approaches, including vaginal
hysterectomy (VH), total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), laparoscopic-assisted
vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), or robotic hysterectomy (RH).
Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was
conducted on 245 women who underwent hysterectomy at Jordan University
Hospital, Amman, Jordan, from January 2017 to 2019. The gravidity, parity, age,
body mass index, the cause and type of the hysterectomy, duration of surgery,
need for blood transfusion, estimated blood loss, time of hospital stay,
intraoperative and postoperative complications, and the histopathology results
were extracted from records of the participants and analyzed.
Results: This study showed that the leading cause of
hysterectomy in participants was abnormal vaginal bleeding. The most common
type of hysterectomy was a simple abdominal hysterectomy with a mean operation
time of 1 hour 12 minutes. In total, 25.6% of women received packaged red blood
cells, the main cause of which was preoperative anemia (17.5%). These results
reflect an improvement in the linear curve of learning surgical skills.
Increasing the learning curve in teaching hospitals will help patients and be
implemented for benign or malignant situations, particularly with the stability
of the medical team. Interestingly, the effect of the acquired skills grew by
practice and proved to be preferential over previous years.
Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated how performing
abdominal hysterectomy improved surgical technique expressively, resulting in
shorter operating times than when using a traditional technique, lower overall
surgical costs, and fewer surgical threads needed for each procedure. Numerous
clinical metrics, such as mean operative time, complication rates, and other
outcome variables, can be used to evaluate surgical expertise. These outcomes
were directly caused by the medical team's perseverance and the development of
surgical abilities.
Author (s) Details
Kamil Fram
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, The University
of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Farah Fram
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, The University
of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Rand Fram
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, The University
of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Eman Sadaqa
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, The University
of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Mahmoud Eid
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, The University
of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Zaid Sunna
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, The University
of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Rana Haddad
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, The University
of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Please see the book here:- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mria/v7/667
No comments:
Post a Comment