The majority of terrestrial magnetism models
aim to explain why the Earth's main magnetic field at the poles is of the order
of 1 Oe. Such a suggestion about the fundamental issue of models of terrestrial
magnetism today is unreasonable. Space flights and the development of astronomy
show that the magnetic moments of all the planets of the solar system, some of
their satellites and a number of stars, are proportional to their angular
moments, a remarkable and previously unknown fact. Therefore, these geophysical
problems have become a special case of a more general problem of celestial body
magnetism. This reality makes it appropriate to reformulate the primary task of
the terrestrial magnetism model and the whole of the Earth. It should explain,
firstly, why the Earth's magnetic moment, as well as that of other space
bodies, is proportional to its angular momentum, and, secondly, why the
coefficient of proportionality is similar to the ratio of world constants
to G1/2/c. This
involves rethinking the model of the Earth's internal structure and
reformulating the main goals of terrestrial magnetism, while it must be
clarified why the ratio of the Earth's magnetic moment to its torque, as well
as that of other celestial bodies, is similar to the ratio of the G1/2/c
universal constants. In the theory discussed, it is shown that having its
centre made up of dense electron-nuclear plasma with constant density and
temperature is energetically favourable for hot stars. It is shown that having
the core made of dense electron-ion plasma is energetically advantageous for
the Planet. At that point, the measured parameters are in line with the results
of the measurement.
Author(s) Details
B. V. Vasiliev
Department of the Ural Polytechnic Institute, Pontecorvo Street, 17-408,
Dubna, Moscow District, Russia.
Saturday, 2 January 2021
A Critical Overview of The Magnetic Field of Earth and Other Celestial Bodies | Chapter 10 | International Research in Environment, Geography and Earth Science Vol. 7
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment