The historical swings between periods of excess credit risk
and phase shifts of tranquil periods with relatively easier banking credit
conditions stimulating investment up to a certain limit raised the debate of
the prevalence of credit risk switching regimes of the type of Markov regime
switching models for credit risk exerting a lagged effect on economic
performance and drained by monetary policy efficacy breakpoint shifts. Credit
risk is at its maximum during recessions because of the increase in the
likelihood of non-repayment of loans as investments perform bad in terms of
profitability. Credit risk is assessed in terms of risk premiums that encompass
the historical effect credit performance exerts on the banking assessment board
of creditworthiness. This instance of modeling credit risk is proven to exhibit
both patterns, although contrasting apparently, but with breakpoints in the
unit root of monetary policy will herald obvious and fathomable key features of
recent economic events driven by financial shocks in Tunisia. The main purpose
of the research is to scrutinize the impact of banking sector related effects
on economic performance depending on credit to the public sector monetary
policy efficacy and economic growth, in order to elucidate the relationship
between financial shocks and economic performance and to forecast future short
run evolution of economic situation starting from an ARDL model exhibiting the
main determinants of credit risk then passing to the diagnostic of a Markov
model with jump effect applied to credit risk in a time series.
The first model shows a positive autocorrelation of credit
risk signaling plausible self-sustaining exacerbation, a positive correlation
with credit to the public sector as a proportion of GDP, a lagged negative
correlation with GDP growth and a negative correlation with monetary policy
efficacy. Granger causality shows that credit risk Granger causes GDP growth
with a lag of three years. When monetary policy efficacy improves output gap
widens. This means that actual output is farther from potential output.
Businesses are having a boom in sales because of the expansionary phase of the
business cycle or a bust because recession. Empirical data and regression
results for the case of Tunisia show the prevalence of a Markov switching
regime for credit risk, validating the jump effect hypothesis corresponding
with a lag to the collapse of economic performance and heralding a sharp
decline in economic performance caused by a phase shift in monetary policy
efficacy. The transition probabilities found empirically validate the hypothesis
of a persistent hypothesis of a first tranquil regime and a jump effect highly
turbulent regime with a severe pike like the one in 2008 whose excessive
negative consequences for economic performance and socioeconomic unrest have
shown up with a lag of three years round end 2010 at the onslaught of regional
MENA economic and sociopolitical meltdowns. The study concluded that the
probability of transition from regime one with jump to regime 2 with steady low
credit risk is very significant, whereas the probability of transition from
regime 2 to regime 1 is expected to be non-significant, which means that regime
switches of financial and socioeconomic distress are not ascertained but when
they happen the return to the steady state is ascertained.
Author(s) Details
Mohamed Miras
Marzouki a
FSEGT Campus El Manar Tunis, Tunisia.
Mariem Mahmoud
FSEGT Campus El Manar Tunis, Tunisia.
Please see the book here:- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nabme/v9/5978
No comments:
Post a Comment