The simulation of the solidification of alloys (like the steels or aluminium alloys) which calculates the melt flow induced by RMF, needs a correct angular velocity vs radius function of the melt. Because it is impossible to obtain information about the melt flow from industrial casting directly, this information can only be obtained from well-monitored experiments using low melting point metals or alloys (e.g., Hg, Ga, GaIn). In this work, the measuring methods suitable for determining this function and analysed for their advantages and disadvantages were first summarised. The angular velocity as a function of the radius was measured by two different methods.
The first one is the Pressure Compensation Method (PCM). In this
case, closed TEFLON crucibles with 60 mm length and 12.5 mm radius and
Ga75wt%In25wt% alloy were used. The angular velocity (ω) was calculated from
the compensation pressure measured at r = 5, 7.5, 10, and 12.5 mm in the 0 – 90
mT range of magnetic induction.
In the case of the second one, a series of data from the
literature was processed. The experiments were carried out with the Turbine
Wheel Method (TWM), Hg flowing in a glass tube with a diameter of 60 mm, which
can be considered practically infinitely long. The value of ω was determined as
a function of the radius by an anemometer immersed in Hg. The maximum value of
B was 25 mT. A Two-poles inductor with 50 Hz was used in both cases.
After processing the data, it was found that (i) the angular
velocity varies significantly along the radius, growing from the wall to the
centre of the crucible, contrary to the assumption often used in simulations
that it is constant and (ii) at the wall of the crucible, the angular velocity
is not zero, contrary to the generally accepted fact that it is definitely
zero.
A physical model and two types of mathematical descriptions were
developed based on the two ω (B, r) datasets. The two types of ω (B, r)
functions could be suitable for the validation of the simulation of melt flow
during the solidification of alloys produced by RMF.
Author
(s) Details
Andras Roosz
Institute of Physical Metallurgy, Metalforming and Nanotechnology,
University of Miskolc, 3515 Miskolc,
Hungary and HUN-REN-ME Materials Science Research Group, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary.
Arnold Ronafoldi
Institute of Physical Metallurgy, Metalforming and Nanotechnology,
University of Miskolc, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary and HUN-REN-ME Materials Science
Research Group, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary.
Maria Sveda
Institute of Physical Metallurgy, Metalforming and Nanotechnology,
University of Miskolc, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary and HUN-REN-ME Materials Science
Research Group, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary.
Zsolt Veres
Institute of Physical Metallurgy, Metalforming and Nanotechnology,
University of Miskolc, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary and HUN-REN-ME Materials Science
Research Group, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary.
Please see the book here:- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/crpps/v9/4705
No comments:
Post a Comment