FHB is one of the most destructive diseases of wheat.
Resistance testing depends strongly on inoculation methods, and on measured
traits. Therefore a four-year (2009-2012) study was performed using spray
inoculation + polyethylene (PE) bag cover, spray inoculation + mist irrigation,
and spawn method supported by mist irrigation on 40 genotypes, 20 from Hungary
and 20 from IFA Tulln, Austria. Each year four isolates were used in artificial
inoculations except the spawn method where maize stalk debris served the
inoculum. Visual Fusarium head blight (FHB) scores, Fusarium damaged kernels
(FDK) and deoxynivalenol (DON) contamination were checked. 7680 FHB and FDK, as
well as 3840 DON analyses served as the background for the statistical
evaluation. The most reliable method used was the spray + polyethylene (PE)
bag; the other two were significantly poorer being valid for all traits. The
FHB scores were the least reliable, whereas the FDK was much more consequent
and the DON gave the best results. The FDK gave much better predictions for DON
contamination than FHB. The cultivar responses correlated well at different
epidemic severities. The presence of the kernel resistance was confirmed and a
new trait as extra kernel susceptibility was described. Presence of DON
resistance was confirmed again, and extra DON susceptibility (overproduction)
was described as a new trait. DON performance varied on the most sensitive
cultivar between 0.32 and 143 mg/kg (mean 17.52 mg/kg) and on the most
resistant genotype between 0.00 and 18.19 mg/kg (mean 1.87 mg/kg). Correlations
between stability and resistance level are r = 0.85 for FHB, 0.78 for FDK, and
0.88 for DON, all at a significance level of p = 0.001. The very close
correlation between FDK and DON contamination (r = 0.81, p = 0.001) proves that
control of DON contamination needs appropriate resistance. In the breeding
program evaluation of FDK is the most important, and then DON will be decided.
Variety registration must be updated; otherwise no improvement on the field
will occur.
Author (s) Details
Prof. Dr. Akos Mesterházy
Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
Dr. Szabolcs Lehoczki-Krsjak|
Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
Dr. Mónika Varga
Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
Dr. Ágnes Szabó-Hevér
Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
Dr. Beata Tóth
Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
View
Book: - http://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/172Author (s) Details
Prof. Dr. Akos Mesterházy
Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
Dr. Szabolcs Lehoczki-Krsjak|
Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
Dr. Mónika Varga
Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
Dr. Ágnes Szabó-Hevér
Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
Dr. Beata Tóth
Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., Szeged, Hungary.
No comments:
Post a Comment