Background: Caesarean section (CS) refers to the delivery of a foetus, placenta and membranes after the age of viability through an abdominal and uterine incision. Caesarean section is further divided into two subtypes as far as the urgency of the operation is concerned. Elective caesarean section refers to those occasions where the decision to carry out caesarean section is made and planned more than 24 hours before delivery. Caesarean section (CS) is an important tool in obstetric care for the reduction of maternal and foetal morbidities and mortalities. This study was done to determine the CS rate, the indications and the maternal and foetal outcome of emergency and elective caesarean sections at the Sacred Heart Hospital Obudu, Cross River State.
Methods: A retrospective review of clinical records of all
patients delivered by CS from September 2011 to August 2016 at the Sacred Heart
Hospital, Obudu, Cross River State, Nigeria was conducted. Data for the study
were extracted from theatre records, labour ward records and neonatal ward
records using a structured questionnaire. The information obtained included
socio-demographic variables, obstetric history and outcome of caesarean
section. The data collected was checked for its completeness, entered into a computer
and analysed using SPSS version 20.0. Frequencies.
Results: There were 2445 deliveries with 453 caesarean
sections during the review period, giving a CS rate of 18.1%. Emergency CS
accounted for 338(74.6%), while elective CS accounted for 115(25.6%). The main
indications for emergency CS were cephalo-pelvic disproportion (CPD) (16.9%)
and obstructed labour (16.0%), followed by breech deliveries. Previous CS was
the main indication for elective CS (50.4%). Generally, the maternal and foetal
outcomes of elective CS were better than emergency CS. There were 4 deaths, all
accounted for by emergency CS, giving a CS mortality of 0.9%. Maternal
morbidities like post-partum haemorrhage, sepsis, and prolonged hospital stay
were worse among the emergency CS patients. Some conditions, like obstetric
fistula and ruptured uterus, were found only amongst the emergency CS patients.
For foetal outcome, poor Apgar score, sepsis, death, jaundice and need for
referral were worse among emergency CS patients.
Conclusion: The incidence of CS is high in this centre, with
a higher rate of emergency than elective CS. Also, the maternal and foetal
outcomes of emergency CS were worse than those of elective CS. Caesarean
section remains an important tool in obstetrics practice for the reduction of
maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. In this review, the main
indications for emergency CS were CPD, obstructed labour and breech
presentation, while previous CS was the main indication for elective CS.
Author (s) Details
Maanongun MT
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Health Sciences, Benue
State University, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.
Ornguze AA
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Health Sciences, Benue
State University, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.
Ojabo AO
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Health Sciences, Benue
State University, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.
Eka PO
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Health Sciences, Benue
State University, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.
Please see the book here:- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/msraa/v3/2630
No comments:
Post a Comment