Artificial Intelligence in Educational Evaluation: Values, Challenges and Optimization Strategies | Chapter 9 | Crisis, AI and the Future of Higher Education

This conceptual study explores the dual impacts of artificial intelligence on educational evaluation systems. Drawing on recent literature, it highlights benefits like improved monitoring and personalised feedback, while also addressing concerns such as algorithmic bias and privacy issues. The study aims to re-evaluate traditional educational paradigms and explore future education models, with the overarching goal of constructing an educational ecosystem attuned to the digital age. It seeks to bridge the gap between technological advancement and educational reform by examining the synergistic intersection of AI and educational evaluation. Adopting a literature research methodology, it synthesises multidisciplinary frameworks from educational philosophy, data ethics, and assessment theory without empirical validation. The research content points out that while artificial intelligence empowers educational evaluation with values such as data-enhanced outcome evaluation, intelligent process analysis, longitudinal value-added assessment, and multidimensional comprehensive evaluation, it currently brings risks, including ethical dilemmas, personal privacy violations, human-machine relationship imbalances, and algorithmic unfairness. To effectively mitigate these risks, this study proposes strategies including strengthening institutional supply to regulate educational evaluation practices, adhering to the logic of educational evaluation to promote the coupling of value rationality and instrumental rationality, and formulating ethical norms for data governance to establish an optimal educational evaluation paradigm. This research contributes to both theoretical advancement in intelligent education assessment and practical guidelines for policymakers navigating AI integration in educational systems.

 

Author(s) Details

Yuqing Zhang
College of Teacher Education, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, Jiangsu, China.

 

Please see the link:- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mono/978-81-990398-9-6/CH9

Economic Value of Human: Critics and Conflicts| Chapter 8 | Research Aspects in Arts and Social Studies Vol. 5

 Life and human beings have judicial unity. Hence, since all objects that are significant to life have the value, human beings are valuable. By creating and bearing objects, people reciprocate accompanying them, buy and sell them, and exchange with bureaucracy. By engaging in practical ventures, people have formed themselves in a manner akin to that at which point they produced ability. If creativity is exchanged between people, then standards show the price and people are discussed like commodities. People connect with each one through such norms while they exchange goods utilizing money. While "money" is judged as "the parity" when exchanging merchandise, "norms" are saw as "the parity" when exchanging things. Humans and products become possession through exchange. However, when goods enhance scarce, they are costly, treasured, and prosperous; in an appropriate, such fake and counterfeit goods will perform. The commodity economy has removed counterfeit and low-quality merchandise the same way as the society has discarded the humans’ affectation, that is the indispensable flow of the process of creating the people themselves.

Author(s) Details:

Nguyen Anh Quoc,
University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Nguyen Minh Tri,
HUTECH University, Vietnam.

Nguyen Mai Lam,
Tan Tao University, Vietnam.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/RAASS-V5/article/view/9357

Economic Value of Human: Critics and Conflicts| Chapter 7 | Research Aspects in Arts and Social Studies Vol. 5

 Life and human beings have dialectical unity. Hence, since all objects that are meaningful to life have a certain value, human beings are valuable. By creating and producing objects, people reciprocate with them, connect with them, and exchange with them. By engaging in practical activities, people have created themselves in a manner akin to that in which they produced the goods. If creativity is exchanged among people, then norms show the price and people are treated like commodities. People connect with one another through such norms just as they exchange goods using money. While "money" is regarded as "the parity" when exchanging goods, "norms" are regarded as "the parity" when exchanging individuals. Humans and products become commodities through exchange. However, when goods become scarce, they are costly, valued, and prosperous; as a result, such fake and counterfeit goods will appear. The commodity economy has eliminated counterfeit and low-quality goods the same way as the society has got rid of the humans’ affectation, which is the indispensable trend of the process of creating the people themselves.

Author(s) Details:

Nguyen Anh Quoc,
University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Nguyen Minh Tri,
HUTECH University, Vietnam..

Nguyen Mai Lam,
Tan Tao University, Vietnam.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/RAASS-V5/article/view/9357

Suggested Model to Measure the Value of Syrian Mobile Phone Operator's Brand Names: A Conjoint Analytical Approach | Chapter 4 | Current Approaches in Science and Technology Research Vol. 5

 A company's brand is a valuable intangible asset. In this paper, nominal values of Syrian mobile phone operators' brands were measured using the Conjoint Analysis technique based on Syrians' preferences, introducing good data measurements for Syrian mobile operators in order to prepare good Brand strategic plans. Many mathematical techniques were used to calculate the nominal value of a brand name. Conjoint analysis is one of many techniques that have been widely used in marketing research to evaluate consumer preference for hypothetical products and services.

Author (s) Details

Ahmad Taha Kahwaji
Strategic Management, Brescia University, Italy and College of Commerce and Business Administration, Dhofar University, Sultanate of Oman.

Wissam Abou Khalel
Damascus University, Higher Institute for Administrative Development, Damascus, Syria and Tubingen University, Germany.

View Book :-  https://stm.bookpi.org/CASTR-V5/article/view/1613