International Investment Law Cannot Limit the State's Regulation | Chapter 12 |New Innovations in Economics, Business and Management Vol. 7

 Recognize international investment law as a component of international law control and management, then study the interactions between foreign investors and the host country's government, contrasting it with the role of state regulation. It was detailed how a qualitative case study was used in the research and how source material was collected to express the role of international investment regulations. The researcher contacted representatives from the United Kingdom, the United States, and China to obtain some implementation examples. A complete comparison was made after a careful assessment of the literature from the United Kingdom and the United States. Some of the study's findings are as follows: (1) After explaining the main procedural and substantive issues, we identify the restriction of the foreign investment role in providing protection for foreign investors against state regulation, based on these interpretations of international investment law. (2) There is no comprehensive or integrated international treaty on foreign investment regulation. (3) After completing a study of the function of investment law in preventing investor rights in jurisprudence, international investment law can be considered one of the pioneers for investor protection. (4) With the growth of international investment and the number of corporations operating in foreign nations, the application of public international law's main notions has been regarded insufficient to control foreign investment.

Author(S) Details

Eman Adel Eid Hassan
Ahram Candian University, 6th of October City, Egypt.

View Book:- https://stm.bookpi.org/NIEBM-V7/article/view/6397

Discussion on Neoliberalism & the Marketisation of Social Housing: A Study of Four Countries | Chapter 14 | New Horizons in Education and Social Studies Vol. 9

 The emergence of Neoliberalism as the dominant global political and economic paradigm since the late twentieth century has had an influence on the social housing sectors in various countries. This philosophy has brought market pressures to bear on the provision of social housing, which has traditionally been synonymous with providing a service to meet a societal need. This chapter builds on an earlier paper that examined the experiences of four countries in order to better understand the effect of marketisation on their social housing sectors. The countries chosen have a number of historical similarities. Despite the fact that each has developed within its own context, they share certain commonalities. The Netherlands, the United States of America (USA), Australia, and the United Kingdom are among the countries examined (UK). Text has been added to update the study's specifics, including the conclusion, which assesses how market forces in housing have been aligned with the underlying thrust of a Neoliberal agenda to reduce the state's position in these countries. The government's role in providing social services The global effect of Neoliberalism on their political and economic structures has resulted in a reduction in housing in various countries. The essence of such transition must be viewed in the light of each country's historical and organisational context.

Author (s) Details

Dr. S. P. Taylor
University of Cumbria, Fusehill Street, Carlisle, CA1 2HH, England.

View Book :-  https://stm.bookpi.org/NHESS-V9/issue/view/52