Showing posts with label revised trauma score. Show all posts
Showing posts with label revised trauma score. Show all posts

Monday, 25 April 2022

Basics of Human Resource Management | Book Publisher International

Technology, machinery, projects, and execution are the main topics of engineering education. It concentrates the instrumentation of an engineered task into a plan and design in the form of a project. It is essentially and largely concerned with tools and equipment. Techniques, equipment, and measurements are used, but the human aspect is ignored. a part of it. The title of this book refers to the type, topic, and purpose of the work. Orientation of various types of industries and their respective human resource requirements The goal of the book is to provide readers with an introduction to the human condition. With object-oriented management, you can manage resources, their recruitment, deployment, and utility. The research This book will assist engineering graduates in determining their status and qualifications. appropriateness for various sorts of companies based on various human resource requirements resource. At the same time, the goal of this work is to present a new perspective on human nature. At the time of Industry 4.0, resource management was a hot topic.


Author (s) Details

Anoop Kumar Tiwari
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, India.

View Book :- https://stm.bookpi.org/BHRM/article/view/6494

Sunday, 24 April 2022

Outcome Prediction in Elderly Trauma victims Based on Anatomical (ISS, NISS), Physiological (RTS) and Combined (TRISS) Trauma Scoring Systems | Chapter 01 | New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 15

 This study looks into the accuracy of the Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) in predicting mortality in geriatric trauma cases. The research was set up as a prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: A total of 200 elderly trauma patients were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Over the course of 18 months, he was admitted to a tertiary care hospital. Each patient's information was gathered on The ISS, NISS, RTS, and TRISS are all calculated on the day of admission. Results: The patients' average age was 66.35 years. The most common type of injury is a sprain. A traffic accident accounted for 94.0 percent of the total, with a 17.0 percent mortality rate. The accuracy of prediction of Using receiver operator analysis, the ISS, NISS, RTS, and TRISS for mortality prediction were evaluated. ROC curves are a type of characteristic curve. The most accurate cut-off points for predicting death in elderly trauma patients A score of 91.6 was obtained using the TRISS system (sensitivity 97 percent, specificity 88 percent, and area under the ROC curve). 0.972), and the NISS cut-off point was 17 (91 percent, 93 percent, 0.970); for the ISS, the optimum cut-off point was 17 (91 percent, 93 percent, 0.970). The point was 15 (91 percent, 89 percent, 0.963), while RTS was 7.108. (97 percent ,80 percent ,0.947). There were statistical findings. differences in the area under the ROC curve between ISS, NISS, RTS, and TRISS (p0.0001). Conclusion: The TRISS was the best predictor of success when compared to the ISS, NISS, and RTS. In geriatric trauma patients, mortality is high.


Author (s) Details

Krishna Moorthy
Department of Emergency Medicine, Sri Devraj URS Medical College, Sri Devraj URS Academy of Higher Education and Research Center, Kolar, Karnataka-563101, India.

View Book :- https://stm.bookpi.org/NFMMR-V15/article/view/3861

Friday, 17 September 2021

Determining the Relative Difficulty of English Writings by Fuzzy Reasoning and Its Application to Selecting Teaching Materials | Chapter 1 | New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 15

This study looks into the accuracy of the Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) in predicting mortality in geriatric trauma cases.

The research was set up as a prospective observational study.

Materials and Methods: Over an 18-month period, 200 elderly trauma patients hospitalised to a tertiary care hospital participated in a prospective observational study. The ISS, NISS, RTS, and TRISS were calculated using data collected from each patient on the day of admission.

Results: The patients' average age was 66.35 years. A traffic accident was the most common cause of injury (94.0 percent), with a fatality rate of 17.0 percent. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the predicted accuracies of the ISS, NISS, RTS, and TRISS for mortality prediction. The best cut-off point for predicting mortality in elderly trauma patients using the TRISS system was 91.6 (sensitivity 97 percent, specificity 88 percent, area under ROC curve 0.972); similarly, the best cut-off point for the NISS was 17 (91 percent, 93 percent, 0.970); the best cut-off point for the ISS was 15 (91 percent, 89 percent, 0.963); and the best cut-off point for the RTS was 7.108. (97 percent ,80 percent ,0.947). In terms of area under the ROC curve, there were statistical differences between ISS, NISS, RTS, and TRISS (p0.0001).

Conclusion: The TRISS was the best predictor of mortality in senior trauma patients when compared to the ISS, NISS, and RTS.


Author (S) Details


Krishna Moorthy

Department of Emergency Medicine, Sri Devraj URS Medical College, Sri Devraj URS Academy of Higher Education and Research Center, Kolar, Karnataka-563101, India..


View Book :- https://stm.bookpi.org/NFMMR-V15/article/view/3861