Showing posts with label paired test. Show all posts
Showing posts with label paired test. Show all posts

Friday, 6 November 2020

A Mini Review on the Thyroid Function Status by Paired Test| Chapter 11 | Current Topics in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 8

 By combining their reference ranges, we classified a population of 34159 FT4 & TSH paired test results. This established 9 groups and the association between them with class-specific hormonal ranges. The euthyroid population (24722) with normal FT4 and TSH had FT4 & TSH respectively (14.83-14.90 pmol / ml) and (2.40-2.43 μIU / ml). A case-alone FT4 can classify the class because a class's FT4 has a substantial mean difference from all the remaining 8 classes (sig < .002) except in 2 unique cases that can be overcome by their TSH (sig.000). In all of our classes, there is no clear correlation between FT4 and TSH (r < .445) and so it warns against using TSH alone in diagnostic or follow-up environments. For all thyroid cases with abnormal activity, we conclude that the immediate useful performance of our analysis is the objective of a single biochemical goal. We believe that future research trends should concentrate on searching for individual class aetiology / cause(s) and the accumulated data of such studies can help us understand the phenomenon of shifting functional status of cases with particular aetiology, simplify diagnostic and therapeutic workups, and also establish better treatment protocols for common as well as uncommon & emerging disorders.


Author(s) Details

Prof. Tofail Ahmed

Department of Endocrinology, Bangladesh Institute for Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

View Book :-
https://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/316  

Assessment of Thyroid Function Status by Paired Test| Chapter 10 | Current Topics in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 8

 Goal and Methods: We reviewed 34159 test results to understand the usefulness of paired FT4 and TSH tests in assessing Thyroid functional status in diagnostic and follow-up settings. By using the laboratory comparison ranges of FT4 and TSH, we divided the population into all nine possible groups. Then we calculated the frequency of the classes, the FT4 and TSH reference ranges for each class, their mean differences (MD) between classes and the association within a class between FT4 and TSH. Results: The typical FT4 and TSH scale of our euthyroid population is 24722. The mean confidence interval of their FT4 and TSH is 95 percent (14.83-14.90 pmol / ml) and (2.40-2.43 μIU / ml) respectively, and their correlation (r value) is -0.056; sig. Just 0.000. Main Hypo & Hyperthyrodism; Compensated Hypo & Hyperthyrodism; Secondary Hypo & Hyperthyrodism and Isolated Hypo & Hyperthyroximia. The 8 groups of irregular status are with 4 pairs of hypo and hyperthyroximic state. 4 types, namely Primary Hypothyroid, Primary Hyperthyroid, Compensated Hypothyroid and Compensated Hyperthyroid, represent the main bulk of irregular thyroid activity (98.15 percent). The remaining classes are special. Class FT4 has a substantial mean difference from all 8 other classes (sig < .002), with the exception of 2 out of a total of 36 cases. And for their TSH, there are significant MDs in these 2 pairs with non-significant MD for FT4 (sig.000). There is a clear association between FT4 and TSH in none of the 8 groups of abnormal functions (r < -0.5). Only 2 classes of primary hypothyroidism (r = -0.445; Sig. 0.000) and primary hyperthyroidism (r = -0.386; Sig. 0.000) record a mild negative relation. They are not associated in the euthyroid class (r=-0.056; sig. 0.000). Therefore, in diagnostic or follow-up environments, TSH alone should not be used for assessing functional status. Conclusion: 9 classes with class-specific FT4 and TSH ranges and their correlation patterns can be identified by the Paired Test. We conclude that this tool should be used to assess functional status and use Euthyroid's FT4 reference range as the treatment target for abnormally functioning cases.


Author(s) Details

Prof. Tofail Ahmed
Department of Endocrinology, Bangladesh Institute for Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, Dhaka, Bangladesh.


Professor Hajera Mahtab
Department of Endocrinology, Bangladesh Institute for Research and Rehabilit Disorders, Dhaka, Bangladesh.


Dr. Tania Tofail
Department of Endocrinology, Bhangabando Sheikh Mujibur Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.


Md. A. H. G. Morshed
Endocrinology Laboratory, Diabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.


Shahidul A. Khan
Endocrinology Laboratory, Diabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.


View Book :- https://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/316