Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a complex disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). It affects a diverse population across various age groups and ethnicities. IBS is a common medical disorder worldwide, with reported prevalence rates ranging from 5% to 35%. Patients diagnosed with IBS often experience significant disruptions in their daily activities and a diminished quality of life, which can be attributed to the limited effectiveness of conventional treatment options. Additionally, the long-term consequences of the condition may give rise to psychological challenges, potentially resulting in polypharmacy or the concurrent use of multiple medications. This scenario presents inherent risks, including the possibility of drug interactions, a decline in overall health, and increased healthcare costs. The symptoms of IBS may include abdominal pain and bloating, frequently associated with visceral hypersensitivity and psychological factors, along with diarrhea, constipation, or a combination of these bowel patterns. In accordance with the Rome IV criteria, IBS is classified based on different types of bowel patterns. There are four recognized subtypes of IBS: IBS with constipation (IBS-C), IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D), mixed IBS (IBS-M), and unsubtyped IBS (IBS-U). This classification system facilitates the accurate diagnosis and effective management of the condition.
The IBS-C subtype affects a significant number of patients,
particularly older adults and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.
Recent studies indicate that IBS-C is linked to higher levels of functional
impairment compared to other subtypes of IBS.
Conventional pharmacological and non-pharmacological
treatment options for IBS-C have limited effectiveness and may cause
significant adverse effects. This results in higher long-term healthcare costs.
Over the past few decades, the ineffectiveness in treating patients with IBS-C
has largely stemmed from a poor understanding of the disease's pathophysiology,
a failure to consider the patient as a whole, and inappropriate patient
selection and treatment endpoints in clinical trials.
Over the past two decades, significant advancements have
been made in the development of effective and safer pharmacologic treatments
for IBS-C. These advancements are grounded in an enhanced understanding of the
pathophysiological mechanisms underlying IBS-C and the introduction of
medications that demonstrate increased selectivity within established
pharmacologic classes recognized for their efficacy.
This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive
overview of the available treatment options for IBS-C, highlighting their
mechanisms of action, as well as their efficacy and safety profiles as
determined by pertinent clinical trials. The review commences with a summary of
laxative-based therapies and subsequently offers an up-to-date evaluation of
four distinct classes of medications: prokinetics, prosecretory agents, bile
acid modulators, and tenapanor.
Author (s) Details
Khaled Jadallah
Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdullah University Hospital, Faculty
of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Roberto De Giorgio
Department of Translational Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara,
Italy.
Rami Jadallah
Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdullah University Hospital, Faculty
of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Please see the book here:- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/msti/v4/4177
