This study discusses the experiences with
innovation dissemination and testing the PB’s effectiveness. Using a
retrospective study design, with minimal time and cost, obstetrical units could
assess the effectiveness of PB protocols and add their findings to the growing
literature. To reduce the high number of cesarean births in the US, the
Association of Women's Health Obstetrical and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN) has
started a Peanut Ball campaign. Because of their immobility and flexible
pelvis, women who undergo epidural anesthesia are particularly prone to
delivery by cesarean section. The peanut ball (PB) is a birthing ball that when
placed between the mother’s legs can increase pelvic dimensions and facilitate
fetal descent and birth. This study took place in an urban HMO hospital in
Southern California that opted to use peanut balls (PBs) among laboring
patients under epidural anesthesia. Using a retrospective study design that
uses data collected for non-research purposes saves time and cost. Our retrospective
study examined the difference in VDs with patient-controlled epidural
anesthesia (PCEA) in the first five months of 2016 prior to PB use compared
with the same months in 2017 post-intervention. Using a paired t-test we found
a significant difference in successful PCEA vaginal births in 2016 compared to
2017 (p = .008). This retrospective study design can be easily replicated in
other venues whose results could provide evidence for a simple inexpensive way
to promote AWHONN’s campaign of preventing cesarean births.
Author(s)
Details:-
Lauren
Outland
Nursing Faculty, School of Nursing, California
State University, Dominguez Hills, United States.
Yolanda
Alvarado
Department of Nursing, Nursing Faculty, West Coast
University, United States.
Please see the link here: https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/rudhr/v6/3117G
No comments:
Post a Comment