Showing posts with label collective rationality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label collective rationality. Show all posts

Friday, 3 March 2023

Shapley Value Allocation Approach to Assess Conflicts Over Logone River Basin | Chapter 8 | Research Aspects in Arts and Social Studies Vol. 7

 The objective concerning this paper is to administer game theory tools to resolve conflicts over a large body of water allocation question in the logone river pool.  Natural resources management is the manipulation of system-producing unaffected systems to advance their long-term productivity for two together human use and biological result. The use of water in the Logone Basin has been a main source of contention middle from two points users to a degree farmers and fishermen. In this paper, we examine how cooperative theory of games can help us understand the significance of coordination. A beneficial mathematical programming is used to decide the net land benefit of the players in the water administration competition. The Shapley value plan is used for the second opportunity to find the appropriate equilibrium that answer all users. This method was used to the real-globe case of the Logone River, which is individual of the rivers suffering from water shortage in the Lac Chad basin. The study further demonstrated that cooperative theory of games can be used to resolve water conflicts and the authority can therefore implement institutions that urge to coordination.

Author(s) Details:

Maya Ernest,
University of Maroua, Cameroon.

Ngouhouo Ibrahim,
University of Dschang, Cameroon.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/RAASS-V7/article/view/9732

Thursday, 29 September 2022

A Brief Study about Rationality and Institutions | Chapter 8 | Research Aspects in Arts and Social Studies Vol. 2

 Giving up on logical reasoning is becoming commonplace in the social sciences. Arguments are made that rationality as the maximisation of self-interest is immoral and impracticable. Rational choice, however, is the paradigm that is most important for understanding human behaviour. D. Kahneman criticised the two extremes of perfect individual rationality and group or collective decision-making in his contribution to the study of human behaviour. The first is harmed by bias, whereas the second is harmed by noise. As a result, there is some sort of paradox here because group ratio- nality could not make up for individual shortcomings. To evaluate actual behaviour, it can be useful to think of rationality as an ideal type. Game theory can be used informally to apply Weber's action frame of reference or expected value maximisation. A causal relationship between the real means used and the actual achievement of the purpose is required in addition to intention.


Author(s) Details:

Jan-Erik Lane,
University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/RAASS-V2/article/view/8308