An Overview on Methodology in Economics | Chapter 03 | New Innovations in Economics, Business and Management Vol. 9

 

The methodological explanation of an interdisciplinary approach in economics is presented in this work. A mixture or synthesis of philosophical and mathematical methodologies is referred to as bimodal methodology. It necessitates an examination of a brief history of economic methodology, two conceptions for global vision, and three methodological tendencies related to it. The philosophy of economics and its respective discipline are part of the philosophical basis of economic methodology. The presentation of positivism, notably that of Mill, Marshall, Popper, Lakatos, Friedman, and Dewey, is a key methodological position in economic theory. In economic science, four methodological perspectives are used: methodological individualism, methodological holism, institutional individualism, and methodological institutionalism. In economic research, mathematical ideas of economic technique have always been prevalent. Last but not least, the "New Macroeconomic Consensus" (NCM) model, which ensures continual interrelationships and the interplay of the two major economic philosophies – neoclassical and post-Keynesian. The major methodological perspectives on economic theory may describe economic life in all of its aspects - micro, macro, and geoeconomic levels.

Author(S) Details

Anton S. Filipenko
Department of World Economy and International Economic, Relations of the Institute of International Relations of Taras, Shevchenko, National University of Kyiv, Ukraine.

View Book:- https://stm.bookpi.org/NIEBM-V9/article/view/6876

Pragmatics: Why do We Need It? | Book Publisher International

In culture, interactions between individuals are inevitable. Many invisible meanings give space to these interactions. Whose inquiry is known as pragmatics. Pragmatics, in other words, is the linguistic area in which invisible meanings are found. The manner in which language is used is dealt with. The meaning of the speaker, the meaning of the word, or even the meaning of the sentence, the context, the understanding of the listener, the language used, are taken into account. The way that social distance is conveyed is often focused on what is communicated rather than what is said. Pragmatics considers debate as an agency. No one is able to talk the way he wants in a given situation. There are norms, say criteria to be collected for every situation to be legitimised. As meaning is not external to the context waiting to be taken, we need pragmatics as a useful tool for taming darkness in communication. Rather, it is the product of the complex behaviour of the participants of the debate, ranging from explanations, effects and implications.

Author(s) Details

Zorobi Philippe TOH
Alassane Ouattara University, Côte d’Ivoire.

View Book :- https://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/378

Critical Discourse Analysis into Practice | Book Publisher International

 The term "discourse" originates from "discursus"; "conversation" means a Latin utterance. It can be a mode of daily communication, formal discussions, addresses, religious or political orations that are written or oral. Since the medium, because it expresses an opinion or an ideology, discourse has social influence over people. Discourse dealing is to refer to the discursive practises in which meaning is contained. The laws of discourse demand that linguistic signals be explicit and important. Among these important discourse commentators, several linguists have discussed notions of dominance and hegemony.

Author (s) Details

Zorobi Philippe Toh
Alassane Ouattara University, Côte d'Ivoire.

Koffi Eugene N'guessan
Alassane Ouattara University, Côte d'Ivoire.

View Book :- https://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/284