Introduction: Quality is at the heart of transformative education, and lecturers play a crucial role in providing quality education. This belief encourages to state that in as much as factors such as institutional support, curriculum design, and student engagement influence educational quality, the role of the lecturer remains critical. However, there is a need to emphasise in this chapter that the quality of human resources in any country is a necessity. To be specific, universities have a multifaceted nature of human resources, encompassing not only lecturers but also support staff, administrators, and policymakers. This refers to skilled and semi-skilled staff. Universities focus on constantly improving lecturers’ capacity for research, teaching, innovation and industrialisation skills, and knowledge that lecturers require. This is essential because they also have a direct impact on students' learning experiences. As a result, it is critical to assess the efficacy of lecturer development programmes in terms of higher education quality assurance management.
Objective: The purpose of this chapter is to analyse the
effectiveness of the lecturer development programme in enhancing teaching
abilities and skills.
Results: Universities can increase the quality of their teaching
and research by implementing lecturer development programmes, which in turn
boost their reputation. Thus, investment in lecturer development programmes can
be considered a sustainable strategy to advance the quality of higher education
and achieve the goal of developing quality human resources. It has also been
found that a supportive institutional culture that prioritises quality
assurance leads to better alignment between teaching practices and the desired
learning outcomes. However, the challenges of lecture development programs
involve the dynamics of technological change, globalisation, and demands for
curriculum diversification. Along with these challenges, there are also ongoing
innovations in the design and implementation of these programmes.
Conclusion: Lecturer
development was emphasised as a purposeful process that gives teachers the
abilities and information they need to successfully negotiate the ever-changing
terrain of teaching and learning, while integration was defined as the
methodical incorporation of quality assurance concepts into all facets of
instructional practice.
Author (s) Details
Musakanyi Barbra Nyum
Robert Mugabe School of Heritage and Education, Great Zimbabwe University,
Zimbabwe.
Makuvire Claretah
Faculty of Science Education, Bindura University of Science Education,
Zimbabwe.
Muzenda Denius
Robert Mugabe School of Heritage and Education, Great Zimbabwe University,
Zimbabwe.
Please see the book here:- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mono/978-93-49729-81-0/CH8
No comments:
Post a Comment