This
paper proves mathematically in an original theoretical model the common sense
and intuitive proposition that consumers are better off when they have more
food for the Sabbath at the expense of having less food for the other six days
of the week. I prove the conditions of shifting consumption from off peak to
peak times will necessarily add to consumer surplus. Like the manna that fell
from heaven for forty years in the desert — an omer to a person, Sunday through
Friday with double portions on Friday — my model assumes that consumers buy
standardized semi-perishable food baskets, one basket per person per day,
Sunday through Friday with extra baskets for the Sabbath. In my model I analyze
benefits to consumers according to two alternative pricing schemes, whereby
consumer expenditures and weekly food consumed are the same. I prove that
consumers are better off according to the pricing scheme that allows for more
food for the Sabbath day. The significance of my proof is to urge social focus
on increasing and prolonging cyclical peaks. My proof supports John M. Clark’s workable
competition thesis.
Author(s) Details
Gerald Aranoff
Professor of Accounting, Bnei Brak, Israel.
View Book :- http://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/185
Author(s) Details
Gerald Aranoff
Professor of Accounting, Bnei Brak, Israel.
View Book :- http://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/185
No comments:
Post a Comment