Advances in Systems Analysis of Artificial Intelligence | Chapter 9 | Science and Technology: Recent Updates and Future Prospects Vol. 11

 

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a branch of computer science dealing with the simulation of intelligent behavior. Artificial Intelligence (AI) constitutes an amorphous phenomenon. There are many different conceptions, subconcepts, and hypotheses offered. Technologies are praised, but the final results remain unclear. It appears to be an industry in its infancy, with the life cycle itself enveloped in a future mystique. This article focuses on methods for enclosing this idea within a systems framework.

 

The article resorts to qualitative analysis. An AI system construct is the ultimate objective of the analysis. It advances a systems theory framework as the boundary for an AI structure where all things would fall into place. The article suggests a framework where an artificial intelligence system has inputs, transformation processes and output. A feedback loop as well. AI Inputs, transformation and output elements are all present-day concepts referred to in current literature but not related to each other within a systems structure.

 

The article concludes with a system construct for artificial intelligence. It further applies this system construct to a contemporary management issue i.e. strategic thinking. It relates system outcomes to strategic thinking patterns and modes. It suggests a strategic thinking framework that makes use of the outcomes of AI system flows, and translates those into strategic behavior patterns and approaches.

 

The article provides a convenient vehicle for understanding the components of artificial intelligence and their flow. Also, the relationship between AI system outcomes and strategic thinking. It could be useful in understanding AI applications and their situational relevance.

 

 

Author(s) Details

M. S. S. El Namaki
School of Management, Victoria University, Switzerland.

 

Please see the link:- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/strufp/v11/1671

 

Could Cognitive Flexibility Influence Strategic Behavior? | Chapter 12 | Advances and Challenges in Science and Technology Vol. 8

 Patterns of clever behavior express crucial choices. Analysis, in a variety of forms, leads to a span of crucial choices and resultant analysis leads to an expression of a choice. Quality of the final strategy depends on the outlook, scale and depth of the analysis nearly the selection process. Both processes that is the analysis and the selection process keep constitute a obscure whole penetrated, only, by a measure of sharp cognition. Not motionless cognition but vital or flexible cognition.The following item identifies the contours of pliable cognitive analysis in addition to the possible impact of bendable cognitive analysis on the process of concoction of a strategy expression “boundary”. Alternative strategic attitude patterns are, then, derivative.The article addresses a novel issue infrequently or may be never addressed in administration, psychology or central nervous system literature before i. e. the relationship 'tween cognition and calculated thinking. It creates a bridge between three obvious sciences: strategy, medicine and neurology. The neurology and therapy element survey the cognitive roles and functions of particular elements of the human intellect. It resorts to essential neurology terms and appropriate cognitive and pliancy frameworks. The strategy component relates intelligent functions to patterns of strategic behaviour."The item is eclectic. The three foundation punishments i.e. central nervous system, psychology and strategy are investigated in search of a abstract framework that relates all three factors. Premises of certain dimensions of intellect studies within central nervous system are related to premises of attitude and both are had connection with elements of strategic administration.It is the author’s contention that bendable cognition could improve strategic thinking through four fads. First there is generic pliancy. Second is visionary competencies. Third is synaptic pliancy. Fourth and possibly most significant, is intuitiveness. Flexible cognition manage especially induce more protracted term strategic observations or the ability to evaluate hopes and beliefs and assume penetrative distant outlooks.

Author(s) Details:

M. S. S. El-Namaki,
VU School of Management, Switzerland and Maastricht School of Management (MSM), Netherlands and Montreal International Center for Management (MICM), Canada.

Please see the link here: https://stm.bookpi.org/ACST-V8/article/view/12391