Showing posts with label Montesquieu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Montesquieu. Show all posts

Tuesday, 3 August 2021

Recent Development and Studies: Public Sector, Information and Incentives | Chapter 3 | Modern Perspectives in Economics, Business and Management Vol. 2

 The people of the country would ultimately choose the logic of a democratic administration. Their governance requirements would be decisive in determining the state's means and aims. In today's environment, what constitutes real information? Not only in the business sector - market trends and enterprise data - but also in the public sector, there is a search for information. Information and incentives are inextricably linked: leak news, and you get an extra month's rent. This work began in the public sector and attempts to mimic the critical role of information and its incentives in government. In the history of political thinking, we come across two philosophers, Hobbes and Montesquieu, who are particularly tolerant of the principal-agent framework.


Author (s) Details

Jan-Erik Lane
University of Geneva, Switzerland.

View Book :- https://stm.bookpi.org/MPEBM-V2/article/view/2321

Thursday, 5 November 2020

Recent Discussion on Law and Politics: Montesquieu and the 4 Schools of Legal Theory | Chapter 8 | New Horizons in Education and Social Studies Vol. 5

 

Montesquieu's (1748) principle of the division of powers in the state is the longest serving theory in real politics, retaining its importance for over 200 hundred years. At least from a formal point of view, most constitutions in written form follow his paradigm. For the rule of law and political order, parliamentary democracies definitely apply or impose Montesquieu 's ideal-type. How does this great political theory match with the jurisprudence of the major schools on what law is and the role of judges in adjudication? This problem has never been raised, but in, for example, parliamentarism and presidentialism, it is as central to the paradigm of Montesquieu as the evolving ties between executive and legislature. The teachings of legal positivism and legal positivism, to preserve the equilibrium of Montesquieu, They appear most instrumental in pragmatism. When a nation says goodbye to Oriental Despotism, more than anything else, they rely on Montesquieu. "Eastern despotism" is also said to be like "orientalism," coined by Europeans like Montesquieu and other thinkers of the Enlightenment to uplift Europe and downgrade Asia. But we still find despotism today in many Central Asian countries.


Author(s) Details

Jan-Erik Lane
Public Policy Institute, Belgrade, Yangon, Myanmar.


View Book :-
https://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/311