This article aims to stimulate thoughtful engagement with the philosophical and cultural implications of AI's influence on aesthetics. By examining AI as an embodiment of beauty, this study contributes to the ongoing dialogue on how technological advancements necessitate a revision of established beauty norms. Artificial Intelligence (AI) was considered as an object of beauty through philosophical lenses. The author explores how AI redefines aesthetic norms. The study traces the evolution of beauty from Platonic ideals to contemporary interpretations, arguing that AI's emergence offers a unique illustration of beauty in the modern age. The article delves into the philosophical foundations of beauty, examining historical perspectives and extending this analysis to contemporary theories. Arguments in favor of AI as a manifestation of beauty include its innovative capabilities, the extension of human creativity, and the objective patterns of beauty it can produce. Counterarguments highlight the absence of emotional resonance, the overemphasis on form, and the potential loss of authenticity. The article also compares AI with divine intelligence, discussing parallels and distinctions in terms of intangibility and the human quest for understanding. The research methodology involves a comprehensive literature review, philosophical analysis, and comparative study of classical and modern aesthetic theories. Key sources include works by Plato, Aristotle, Kant, and contemporary scholars in AI and aesthetics. The study area focuses on the intersection of AI, aesthetics, and philosophy, aiming to provide a holistic understanding of AI's potential to be perceived as beautiful. Future research directions include investigating subjective experiences of individuals interacting with AI-generated art, examining cultural influences on the perception of AI's aesthetic value, and developing new metrics for evaluating the beauty of AI systems. Author(s) Details Vadim Meyl Central European University, Vienna, Austria. Please see the link:- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/cpassr/v2/944

 

This article aims to stimulate thoughtful engagement with the philosophical and cultural implications of AI's influence on aesthetics. By examining AI as an embodiment of beauty, this study contributes to the ongoing dialogue on how technological advancements necessitate a revision of established beauty norms. Artificial Intelligence (AI) was considered as an object of beauty through philosophical lenses. The author explores how AI redefines aesthetic norms.

 

The study traces the evolution of beauty from Platonic ideals to contemporary interpretations, arguing that AI's emergence offers a unique illustration of beauty in the modern age. The article delves into the philosophical foundations of beauty, examining historical perspectives and extending this analysis to contemporary theories. Arguments in favor of AI as a manifestation of beauty include its innovative capabilities, the extension of human creativity, and the objective patterns of beauty it can produce. Counterarguments highlight the absence of emotional resonance, the overemphasis on form, and the potential loss of authenticity. The article also compares AI with divine intelligence, discussing parallels and distinctions in terms of intangibility and the human quest for understanding.

 

The research methodology involves a comprehensive literature review, philosophical analysis, and comparative study of classical and modern aesthetic theories. Key sources include works by Plato, Aristotle, Kant, and contemporary scholars in AI and aesthetics. The study area focuses on the intersection of AI, aesthetics, and philosophy, aiming to provide a holistic understanding of AI's potential to be perceived as beautiful.

 

Future research directions include investigating subjective experiences of individuals interacting with AI-generated art, examining cultural influences on the perception of AI's aesthetic value, and developing new metrics for evaluating the beauty of AI systems.

 

 

Author(s) Details

Vadim Meyl

Central European University, Vienna, Austria.

 

Please see the link:- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/cpassr/v2/944

Varietal Change: The Main Adoption of Technology in Spanish Citrus Culture | Chapter 7 | Current Research Progress in Agricultural Sciences Vol. 6

This study explores how varietal changes have become the primary technological advancement in Spanish citrus farming, serving not only as a crucial factor for optimizing production but also as a response to shifts in consumer demand. Accordingly, the objective has been to assess how varietal change is unfolding over time and its consequences. Methodologically, a series of historical data has been reviewed to explain the evolution of the citrus sector (in terms of area, production, trade, etc.), supplemented by expert interviews to identify the factors influencing the performance of different varieties. Growers select varieties based on expected pricing, commercial and agronomic characteristics, and quality. The market longevity of each variety depends on its performance and the presence of more competitive options. In Spain, certain citrus varieties dominate, with navel oranges—particularly “Navelina” and “Lanelate”—accounting for 37.76% of production, alongside the important late-season white oranges. The mandarin segment is centered on clementines and hybrids, while lemons form another key sector. The sweet orange sector frequently undergoes renewal, primarily within the navel and late-white categories. The findings indicate that early-season clementine varieties often have short market lifespans due to oversupply, whereas mandarin hybrids show significant growth potential driven by rising supermarket demand. The study also considers the impact of varietal clubs that regulate production zones and impose rigorous cultivation and marketing standards, thereby influencing current varietal trends. In conclusion, this research highlights how varietal innovation enhances competitiveness and contributes to the sustainability of Spanish citrus farming amid evolving market pressures.

 

Author (s) Details

 

Maria Angeles Fernandez-Zamudio
Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, UPV (Universitat Politècnica de València) Camino de Vera s/n 46021, Valencia, Spain.

 

Hayet Kerras
Departamento de Economía de la Empresa, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Paseo Alfonso XIII, 48. 30203, Cartagena, Spain.

 

Pedro Caballero
Departamento de Economía Agraria (Researcher until 2010), IVIA (Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias), Carretera CV 315 Km 10, 7. 46113 Moncada, Spain.

 

Maria Dolores de-Miguel
Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, UPV (Universitat Politècnica de València) Camino de Vera s/n 46021, Valencia, Spain.

 

Please see the book here:- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/crpas/v6/3045

Description on Scientific Research and Method | Chapter 5 | Current Approaches in Science and Technology Research Vol. 10

 The scientific method is examined critically and historically in this chapter. Concepts from the sixteenth century will be discussed, and the conversation will continue through the centuries to the present day. What has changed in scientific research during the sixteenth century?

Author (s) Details

Sergio Baragetti
Department of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo Viale Marconi 5, 24044 Dalmine (BG), Italy.

View Book :- https://stm.bookpi.org/CASTR-V10/article/view/2335