Showing posts with label Foley catheter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Foley catheter. Show all posts

Monday, 10 February 2025

Iatrogenic Urethral Injuries: A Comprehensive Guide to Prevention and Best Practices in Catheterization | Chapter 8 | Newer Frontiers IN Urology

Catheterisation is required for 12–16% of inpatients at any given time. The paramedical support crew, junior medical officers, or trainee intern doctors are typically the ones carrying out this treatment. Urethral catheter insertion is a common procedure done in hospital-admitted patients. Iatrogenic urethral injuries are one of the common preventable complications related to urological procedures. Patients with urethral injury present with frank bleeding from the urethra. The bleeding may sometimes be so severe that it may even occasionally present with urosepsis or hemodynamic instability. We describe a case of iatrogenic urethral injury post-catheterisation, following which the patient returned to the ER in shock with an incorrectly positioned catheter. The patient was resuscitated and managed with suprapubic diversion and a perineal compression tamponade. The patient recovered well and voided normally eventually. An orientation program outlining the techniques for catheterisation and the precautions to be taken before inflating the balloon and during catheter insertion is crucial to minimizing this potentially preventable morbidity since most catheterisations are performed by interns, the paramedical support team, or nursing staff. It is advisable to provide education to patients who require self-catheterisation due to detrusor underactivity or stricture urethra self-calibration. Patients who are paraplegic, and need regular bladder emptying have to exert greater caution, especially if the urethra is insensate. A few learning points are to be borne in mind before insertion of the catheter, which if properly followed, can minimize catheterisation-associated morbidity and ensure patient wellness. In order to reduce iatrogenic urethral injuries caused by catheterization, it is the duty of the urologists and senior surgeons to instruct the junior nursing staff and interns on urethral catheterization practices.

 

Author (s) Details

Pradhyumna Koushik
Department of Urology & Renal transplantation, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India.

Nakul Aher
Department of Urology & Renal transplantation, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India.

 

Velmurugan Palaniyandi
Department of Urology & Renal transplantation, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India.

 

Hariharasudhan Sekar
Department of Urology & Renal transplantation, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India.

Sriram Krishnamoorthy
Department of Urology & Renal transplantation, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India.

 

Please see the book here:- https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mono/978-93-49238-86-2/CH8

Sunday, 26 July 2020

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction: Experimental Comparison | Chapter 14 | Research Trends and Challenges in Medical Science Vol.3

 Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol with transcervical Foley catheter for labor induction. Materials and Methods: One hundred and four women with term gestation, with Bishop score<4 and with various indications for labor induction were randomly divided into two groups. In Group I, 25 g of misoprostol tablet was placed intravaginally, 4 hourly up to maximum 6 doses. In Group II, Foley catheter 16F was placed through the internal os of the cervix under aseptic condition and then inflated with 50 cc of sterile saline. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software.  Results: The induction to delivery interval was 14.03 ±7.61 hours versus 18.40 ±8.02 hours (< 0.01). The rate of vaginal delivery was 76.7% versus 56.8% in misoprostol and transcervical Foley catheter group, respectively. Uterine hyperstimulation was more common with misoprostol. Neonatal outcome was similar in both the groups.  Conclusion: Intravaginal misoprostol is associated with a shorter induction to delivery interval as compared to Foley catheter and it increases the rate of vaginal delivery in cases of unripe cervix at term. Transcervical Foley catheter is associated with a lower incidence of uterine hyperstimulation during labor.
Author(s) Details
 Nasreen Noor
 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (JNMCH), Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Aligarh (U.P.) 202002, India.

Dr. Mehkat Ansari
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (JNMCH), Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Aligarh (U.P.) 202002, India.       

Dr. S. Manazir Ali  
Department of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (JNMCH), Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Aligarh (U.P.) 202002, India.

Dr. Shazia Parveen
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (JNMCH), Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Aligarh (U.P.) 202002, India.

View Book :- http://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/211