Based on the 2002 Constitution of the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste, the research's title is a study of the legislation establishing the president's veto right against a draught law on state revenue and expenditure. The president's right to veto and disrupt the process runs counter to his constitutional role as a neutral arbiter.
The President of the Republic has veto power over any draught law, including the State Budget in this case, as stated in article 88 paragraph (1) and (2) of the Republic Democratic of Timor-Leste Constitution of 2002. Enforcing this veto right, on the other hand, raises a number of problems, including: First, there are legal issues where there is a gap in the law because the regulation of norms regarding the 30-day period is still not explicitly stated in article 88 paragraph (1) of the Republic Democratic of Timor-Leste Constitution, necessitating the creation of a special regulation governing the President of the Republic's veto. Second, deciding on veto rights may have unfavourable societal implications. Second, deciding on veto rights can have detrimental effects for the community's order of life, raising worries. Is it the President's authority to determine the President's Veto Rights against the APBN Law, in accordance with the mandate of the Republic Democratic of Timor-Leste constitution of 2002, in the form of a republican government? Is Article 88 of the Republic Democratic of Timor-Leste Constitution of 2002 being applied to the President's Veto Rights on the State Budget Bill? It will also use normative legal research approaches, such as normative jurisidist research and other sorts of normative legal research. In the acquisition of legal resources and the study of interpretation and legal construction methods, statutory techniques, conceptual analysis, and historical approaches are used. As a result, determining the President's Veto Rights on the draught bill of the yearly state budget is a prerogative of the President, with which other institutions cannot interfere. Second, under Article 88 of the Republic Democratic of Timor-Leste Constitution of 2002, the President's Veto Rights on the APBN Bill have been determined. Whereas, because his powers are unaffected by other government organisations, On the APBN Bill, the President's Veto Rights are determined by the President's power to reject and ratify National Parliament submissions. The President may request a court review and/or return it to the National Parliament for deliberation. Second, because the President of Republic Democratic of Timor-Leste did not seek input from other institutions in determining a veto over the draught bill of annual state budget, the President's Veto Rights on the APBN Bill were determined in accordance with Article 88 of the 2002 Republic Democratic of Timor-Leste Constitution. The president's veto power is exercised in the form of Absolute Veto or against the entire package of laws when he declares a veto against the APBN Law.
Author (S) Details
Sebastiana da Costa Pereira
Universidade da Paz Dili, Timor-Leste.
View Book :- https://stm.bookpi.org/MPLLE-V8/article/view/3191
No comments:
Post a Comment